Mitchell Gary F, Parise Helen, Benjamin Emelia J, Larson Martin G, Keyes Michelle J, Vita Joseph A, Vasan Ramachandran S, Levy Daniel
Cardiovascular Engineering, Inc, 327 Fiske St, Holliston, MA 01746, USA.
Hypertension. 2004 Jun;43(6):1239-45. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000128420.01881.aa. Epub 2004 May 3.
With advancing age, arterial stiffness and wave reflections increase and elevate systolic and pulse pressures. An elevated central pulse pressure is generally ascribed to increased wave reflection and portends an unfavorable prognosis. Using arterial tonometry, we evaluated central (carotid-femoral) and peripheral (carotid-brachial) pulse wave velocity, amplitudes of forward and reflected pressure waves, and augmentation index in 188 men and 333 women in the Framingham Heart Study offspring cohort who were free of clinical cardiovascular disease, hypertension, diabetes, smoking within the past 12 months, dyslipidemia, and obesity. In multivariable linear regression models, advancing age was the predominant correlate of higher carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity; other correlates were higher mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and triglycerides and walk test before tonometry (model R2=0.512, P<0.001). A similar model was obtained for carotid-brachial pulse wave velocity (model R2=0.227, P<0.001), although the increase with advancing age was smaller. Owing to different relations of age to central and peripheral stiffness measures, carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity was lower than carotid-brachial pulse wave velocity before age 50 years but exceeded it thereafter, leading to reversal of the normal central-to-peripheral arterial stiffness gradient. In this healthy cohort with a minimal burden of cardiovascular disease risk factors, an age-related increase in aortic stiffness, as compared with peripheral arterial stiffness, was associated with increasing forward wave amplitude and pulse pressure and reversal of the arterial stiffness gradient. This phenomenon may facilitate forward transmission of potentially deleterious pressure pulsations into the periphery.
随着年龄的增长,动脉僵硬度和波反射增加,收缩压和脉压升高。中心脉压升高通常归因于波反射增加,并预示着不良预后。在弗雷明汉心脏研究后代队列中,我们使用动脉张力测量法评估了188名男性和333名女性的中心(颈动脉-股动脉)和外周(颈动脉-肱动脉)脉搏波速度、正向和反射压力波振幅以及增强指数,这些人无临床心血管疾病、高血压、糖尿病、过去12个月内无吸烟史、血脂异常和肥胖。在多变量线性回归模型中,年龄增长是颈动脉-股动脉脉搏波速度升高的主要相关因素;其他相关因素包括较高的平均动脉压、心率、甘油三酯以及张力测量前的步行试验(模型R2 = 0.512,P < 0.001)。对于颈动脉-肱动脉脉搏波速度也得到了类似的模型(模型R2 = 0.227,P < 0.001),尽管随着年龄增长的增加幅度较小。由于年龄与中心和外周僵硬度测量值的关系不同,50岁之前颈动脉-股动脉脉搏波速度低于颈动脉-肱动脉脉搏波速度,但此后超过了它,导致正常的中心到外周动脉僵硬度梯度逆转。在这个心血管疾病危险因素负担最小的健康队列中,与外周动脉僵硬度相比,主动脉僵硬度随年龄增长的增加与正向波振幅和脉压增加以及动脉僵硬度梯度逆转有关。这种现象可能有助于潜在有害压力脉动向前传播到外周。