Suppr超能文献

重症监护病房中的亚综合征谵妄:疾病谱的证据

Subsyndromal delirium in the ICU: evidence for a disease spectrum.

作者信息

Ouimet Sébastien, Riker Richard, Bergeron Nicolas, Cossette Mariève, Kavanagh Brian, Skrobik Yoanna

机构信息

Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital and Université de Montréal, Intensive Care Unit, 5415 Boulevard del'Assomption, H1T 2M4, Montreal, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Intensive Care Med. 2007 Jun;33(6):1007-13. doi: 10.1007/s00134-007-0618-y. Epub 2007 Apr 3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

ICU delirium is common and adverse. The Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) score ranges from 0 to 8, with a score of 4 or higher indicating clinical delirium. We investigated whether lower (subsyndromal) values affect outcome.

PATIENTS

600 patients were evaluated with the ICDSC every 8[Symbol: see text]h.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Of 558 assessed patients 537 noncomatose patients were divided into three groups: no delirium (score = 0; n = 169, 31.5%), subsyndromal delirium (score = 1-3; n = 179, 33.3%), and clinical delirium (score >or=4; n = 189, 35.2%). ICU mortality rates were 2.4%, 10.6%, and 15.9% in these three groups, respectively. Post-ICU mortality was significantly greater in the clinical delirium vs. no delirium groups (hazard ratio = 1.67) after adjusting for age, APACHE II score, and medication-induced coma. Relative ICU length of stay was: no delirium < subsyndromal delirium < clinical delirium and hospital LOS: no delirium < subsyndromal delirium approximately clinical delirium. Patients with no delirium were more likely to be discharged home and less likely to need convalescence or long-term care than those with subsyndromal delirium or clinical delirium. ICDSC score increments higher than 4/8 were not associated with a change in mortality or LOS.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical delirium is common, important and adverse in the critically ill. A graded diagnostic scale permits detection of a category of subsyndromal delirium which occurs in many ICU patients, and which is associated with adverse outcome.

摘要

目的

重症监护病房(ICU)谵妄很常见且具有不良影响。重症监护谵妄筛查检查表(ICDSC)评分范围为0至8分,4分及以上表明存在临床谵妄。我们研究了较低(亚综合征性)分值是否会影响预后。

患者

每8小时用ICDSC对600例患者进行评估。

测量与结果

在558例接受评估的患者中,537例非昏迷患者被分为三组:无谵妄(评分=0;n=169,31.5%)、亚综合征性谵妄(评分=1 - 3;n=179,33.3%)和临床谵妄(评分≥4;n=189,35.2%)。这三组的ICU死亡率分别为2.4%、10.6%和15.9%。在校正年龄、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)评分和药物性昏迷后,临床谵妄组与无谵妄组相比,ICU后死亡率显著更高(风险比=1.67)。相对ICU住院时间为:无谵妄<亚综合征性谵妄<临床谵妄;住院时间为:无谵妄<亚综合征性谵妄≈临床谵妄。与亚综合征性谵妄或临床谵妄患者相比,无谵妄患者更有可能出院回家,且需要康复或长期护理的可能性更小。ICDSC评分增加超过4/8与死亡率或住院时间的变化无关。

结论

临床谵妄在危重症患者中很常见、重要且具有不良影响。一个分级诊断量表能够检测出许多ICU患者中出现的亚综合征性谵妄类别,且其与不良预后相关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验