• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Cochrane系统评价在确定研究需求方面有多大用处?

How useful are Cochrane reviews in identifying research needs?

作者信息

Clarke Lorcan, Clarke Mike, Clarke Thomas

机构信息

UK Cochrane Centre, NHS R&D Programme, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

J Health Serv Res Policy. 2007 Apr;12(2):101-3. doi: 10.1258/135581907780279648.

DOI:10.1258/135581907780279648
PMID:17407660
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the extent to which reports of Cochrane reviews recommend the need for further research and, if so, the extent to which they make suggestions regarding that research.

METHODS

We examined all 2535 reviews in Issue 4, 2005 of The Cochrane Library. Each review was categorized on the basis of whether a suggestion was included about specific interventions, participants, or outcome measures that should be included in future research. We also identified the frequency with which reviews conclude that no more research is needed or feasible, noted the need for further systematic reviewing, and refered to a relevant ongoing or planned study. We also report the number of studies listed in the 'Ongoing Studies' section in each review.

RESULTS

Only 3.2% of reviews suggested explicitly that no more research is needed or feasible. In 82.0% of reviews, suggestions were made as to the specific interventions that need evaluating, in 30.2% the appropriate participants were suggested, and in 51.9% outcome measures were suggested. Suggestions for all three domains were made in 16.9% of the reviews. While 11.6% did not include a specific suggestion about any of these domains, 21.2% of reviews mention a relevant ongoing or planned study in one or both of the 'Implications for Research' and the 'Ongoing Studies' sections.

CONCLUSIONS

Most Cochrane reviews identify residual uncertainty and are a rich source of suggestions for further health-care research.

摘要

目的

确定Cochrane系统评价报告推荐进一步研究的必要性的程度,若有推荐,确定其对该研究提出建议的程度。

方法

我们查阅了《Cochrane图书馆》2005年第4期的所有2535篇系统评价。每篇系统评价根据是否包含关于未来研究应纳入的具体干预措施、参与者或结局指标的建议进行分类。我们还确定了系统评价得出不再需要或不可行进行更多研究的频率,记录了进一步进行系统评价的必要性,并提及了相关的正在进行或计划中的研究。我们还报告了每篇系统评价“正在进行的研究”部分列出的研究数量。

结果

只有3.2%的系统评价明确建议不再需要或不可行进行更多研究。在82.0%的系统评价中,针对需要评估的具体干预措施提出了建议,30.2%的系统评价建议了合适的参与者,51.9%的系统评价建议了结局指标。16.9%的系统评价针对所有三个领域都提出了建议。虽然11.6%的系统评价未针对这些领域中的任何一个提出具体建议,但21.2%的系统评价在“研究意义”和“正在进行的研究”部分中的一个或两个部分提到了相关的正在进行或计划中的研究。

结论

大多数Cochrane系统评价识别出了残留的不确定性,是进一步卫生保健研究建议的丰富来源。

相似文献

1
How useful are Cochrane reviews in identifying research needs?Cochrane系统评价在确定研究需求方面有多大用处?
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2007 Apr;12(2):101-3. doi: 10.1258/135581907780279648.
2
Do clinical experts rely on the Cochrane library?
Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Feb;111(2 Pt 1):420-2. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000300558.51373.ae.
3
Mapping the Cochrane evidence for decision making in health care.绘制Cochrane证据以辅助医疗保健决策。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2007 Aug;13(4):689-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2007.00886.x.
4
The evidence for nursing interventions in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.Cochrane系统评价数据库中关于护理干预措施的证据。
Nurse Res. 2004;12(2):71-80.
5
Investing in updating: how do conclusions change when Cochrane systematic reviews are updated?投资于更新:当Cochrane系统评价更新时结论如何变化?
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005 Oct 14;5:33. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-5-33.
6
Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?更新是否能提高系统评价的方法学质量和报告质量?
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006 Jun 13;6:27. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-6-27.
7
Searching for unpublished trials in Cochrane reviews may not be worth the effort.在Cochrane系统评价中搜索未发表的试验可能不值得费力。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Aug;62(8):838-844.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.09.010. Epub 2009 Jan 6.
8
Missing binary data extraction challenges from Cochrane reviews in mental health and Campbell reviews with implications for empirical research.从 Cochrane 综述(心理健康领域)和 Campbell 综述中提取缺失的二进制数据的挑战及其对实证研究的影响。
Res Synth Methods. 2017 Dec;8(4):514-525. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1268. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
9
Usefulness of Cochrane Skin Group reviews for clinical practice.考克兰皮肤组综述在临床实践中的实用性。
Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2013 Oct;104(8):679-84. doi: 10.1016/j.adengl.2012.12.009. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
10
Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews.系统评价的流行病学及报告特征
PLoS Med. 2007 Mar 27;4(3):e78. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040078.

引用本文的文献

1
Partially systematic thoughts on the history of systematic reviews.对系统评价历史的部分系统思考。
Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 27;7(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0833-3.
2
The citation of relevant systematic reviews and randomised trials in published reports of trial protocols.试验方案发表报告中相关系统评价和随机试验的引用情况。
Trials. 2016 Dec 7;17(1):581. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1713-6.
3
How do we create, and improve, the evidence base?我们如何创建并完善证据基础?
Br Dent J. 2016 Jun 24;220(12):651-5. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.451.
4
History of evidence synthesis to assess treatment effects: Personal reflections on something that is very much alive.评估治疗效果的证据综合史:对某种依然活跃事物的个人思考。
J R Soc Med. 2016 Apr;109(4):154-63. doi: 10.1177/0141076816640243.
5
The Cochrane Collaboration 20 years in.考科蓝协作网成立20周年。
CMAJ. 2013 Sep 17;185(13):1117-8. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.131251. Epub 2013 Aug 26.
6
Development of two shortened systematic review formats for clinicians.为临床医生开发两种简化的系统评价格式。
Implement Sci. 2013 Jun 14;8:68. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-68.
7
The role of systematic reviews in pharmacovigilance planning and Clinical Trials Authorisation application: example from the SLEEPS trial.系统评价在药物警戒计划和临床试验授权申请中的作用:来自 SLEEPS 试验的示例。
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e51787. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051787. Epub 2013 Mar 15.
8
The use of systematic reviews in the planning, design and conduct of randomised trials: a retrospective cohort of NIHR HTA funded trials.系统评价在随机试验的规划、设计和实施中的应用:一项对英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所卫生技术评估基金资助试验的回顾性队列研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Mar 25;13:50. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-50.
9
Planning future studies based on the conditional power of a meta-analysis.基于荟萃分析条件功效规划未来研究。
Stat Med. 2013 Jan 15;32(1):11-24. doi: 10.1002/sim.5524. Epub 2012 Jul 11.
10
Systematic reviews on behavioural and psychological symptoms in the older or demented population.老年人或痴呆人群的行为和心理症状的系统评价。
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2012 Jul 11;4(4):28. doi: 10.1186/alzrt131.