Dhillon Amandeep K, Donners Helen, Pantophlet Ralph, Johnson Welkin E, Decker Julie M, Shaw George M, Lee Fang-Hua, Richman Douglas D, Doms Robert W, Vanham Guido, Burton Dennis R
The Scripps Research Institute, Department of Immunology (IMM-2), 10550 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
J Virol. 2007 Jun;81(12):6548-62. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02749-06. Epub 2007 Apr 4.
Attempts to elicit broadly neutralizing antibody responses by human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) vaccine antigens have been met with limited success. To better understand the requirements for cross-neutralization of HIV-1, we have characterized the neutralizing antibody specificities present in the sera of three asymptomatic individuals exhibiting broad neutralization. Two individuals were infected with clade B viruses and the third with a clade A virus. The broadly neutralizing activity could be exclusively assigned to the protein A-reactive immunoglobulin G (IgG) fraction of all three donor sera. Neutralization inhibition assays performed with a panel of linear peptides corresponding to the third hypervariable (V3) loop of gp120 failed to inhibit serum neutralization of a panel of HIV-1 viruses. The sera also failed to neutralize chimeric simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) and HIV-2 viruses displaying highly conserved gp41-neutralizing epitopes, suggesting that antibodies directed against these epitopes likely do not account for the broad neutralizing activity observed. Polyclonal IgG was fractionated on recombinant monomeric clade B gp120, and the neutralization capacities of the gp120-depleted samples were compared to that of the original polyclonal IgG. We found that the gp120-binding antibody population mediated neutralization of some isolates, but not all. Overall, the data suggest that broad neutralization results from more than one specificity in the sera but that the number of these specificities is likely small. The most likely epitope recognized by the monomeric gp120 binding neutralizing fraction is the CD4 binding site, although other epitopes, such as the glycan shield, cannot be excluded.
通过人类免疫缺陷病毒1型(HIV-1)疫苗抗原引发广泛中和抗体反应的尝试取得的成功有限。为了更好地理解HIV-1交叉中和的要求,我们对三名表现出广泛中和作用的无症状个体血清中的中和抗体特异性进行了表征。其中两名个体感染了B亚型病毒,第三名个体感染了A亚型病毒。所有三名供体血清中广泛的中和活性都可专门归因于与蛋白A反应的免疫球蛋白G(IgG)部分。用一组对应于gp120第三高变区(V3)环的线性肽进行的中和抑制试验未能抑制一组HIV-1病毒的血清中和作用。这些血清也无法中和显示高度保守的gp41中和表位的嵌合猿猴免疫缺陷病毒(SIV)和HIV-2病毒,这表明针对这些表位的抗体可能无法解释所观察到的广泛中和活性。将多克隆IgG在重组单体B亚型gp120上进行分级分离,并将gp120耗尽样品的中和能力与原始多克隆IgG的中和能力进行比较。我们发现,gp120结合抗体群体介导了对一些分离株的中和作用,但并非全部。总体而言,数据表明广泛中和是由血清中不止一种特异性导致的,但这些特异性的数量可能很少。单体gp120结合中和部分最可能识别的表位是CD4结合位点,不过其他表位,如聚糖屏蔽,也不能排除。