Joo Won, Jepsen Karl J, Davy Dwight T
Musculoskeletal Mechanics and Materials Laboratory, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
J Biomech. 2007;40(12):2731-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.01.005. Epub 2007 Apr 5.
Stiffness degradation and strength degradation are often measured to monitor and characterize the effects of damage accumulation in bone. Based on evidence that these properties could be affected by not only damage magnitude but also test conditions, the present study investigated the effect of hold condition and recovery time on measures of tensile damage. Machined human femoral cortical bone specimens were subjected to tensile tests consisting of a pre-damage diagnostic loading cycle, a damage loading cycle and post-damage cycle. Controlled variables were recovery time (1, 10, and 100 min) and hold condition (zero load or zero strain) after the damage cycle. Damage measures were calculated as the ratio of each post-damage cycle to the pre-damage value for loading modulus, secant modulus, unloading modulus, stress relaxation and strain (stress) recovery at 1 min post-diagnostic time. The damage cycle caused reductions in all measures, and some measures varied with recovery time and hold condition. Apparent modulus degradation for both hold conditions decreased with recovery time. Stress relaxation was unaffected by recovery time for both hold conditions. Zero-strain hold conditions resulted in lower values for degradation of modulus and change of relaxation. Stress or strain recovery after the damage cycle was evident through 100 min, but 90% of the recovery occurred within 10 min. The results demonstrate that choice of test conditions can influence the apparent magnitude of damage effects. They also indicate that 10 min recovery time was sufficient to stabilize most measures of the damage state.
通常通过测量刚度退化和强度退化来监测和表征骨中损伤累积的影响。基于这些特性不仅可能受损伤程度影响,还可能受测试条件影响的证据,本研究调查了保持条件和恢复时间对拉伸损伤测量结果的影响。对加工后的人股骨皮质骨标本进行拉伸试验,试验包括损伤前诊断加载循环、损伤加载循环和损伤后循环。控制变量为损伤循环后的恢复时间(1、10和100分钟)和保持条件(零载荷或零应变)。损伤测量值计算为各损伤后循环与损伤前诊断时间1分钟时加载模量、割线模量、卸载模量、应力松弛和应变(应力)恢复值的比值。损伤循环导致所有测量值降低,且一些测量值随恢复时间和保持条件而变化。两种保持条件下的表观模量退化均随恢复时间而降低。两种保持条件下应力松弛均不受恢复时间影响。零应变保持条件导致模量退化和松弛变化的值较低。损伤循环后的应力或应变恢复在100分钟内明显,但90%的恢复发生在10分钟内。结果表明,测试条件的选择会影响损伤效应的表观大小。它们还表明,10分钟的恢复时间足以稳定损伤状态的大多数测量值。