Zacharasiewicz Angela
Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Pulmonary and Infectious Diseases, Wilhelminenspital, Vienna, Austria.
Paediatr Respir Rev. 2007 Mar;8(1):94-6. doi: 10.1016/j.prrv.2007.02.001. Epub 2007 Mar 19.
Conventional asthma management aimed at controlling the underlying airway inflammation is classically based on symptoms and lung function. More recently, various non invasive markers of airway inflammation have become available. The ideal measurement method should be safe, non-invasive, easy to perform, reproducible and accurate. Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) measurements fulfil these criteria, however some issues concerning cut off values and clinical variability as well as the interpretation of high values in the absence of symptoms still need to be solved. Induced sputum measurements are more labour intensive, however have the advantage of providing direct, additional information on the current inflammatory status of the airways. The most frequently analysed marker is sputum eosinophil percentage, although other markers of inflammation have also been under investigation. Both methods, FeNO and induced sputum should be seen as complementary to the conventional tools such as spirometry and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) testing.
传统的哮喘管理旨在控制潜在的气道炎症,经典方法是基于症状和肺功能。最近,各种气道炎症的非侵入性标志物已可供使用。理想的测量方法应安全、非侵入性、易于操作、可重复且准确。呼出一氧化氮分数(FeNO)测量符合这些标准,然而,关于临界值、临床变异性以及无症状时高值的解读等一些问题仍有待解决。诱导痰测量更耗费人力,但具有提供关于气道当前炎症状态的直接、额外信息的优势。最常分析的标志物是痰嗜酸性粒细胞百分比,尽管其他炎症标志物也在研究中。FeNO和诱导痰这两种方法都应被视为传统工具(如肺活量测定和支气管高反应性(BHR)测试)的补充。