Shariat Shahrokh F, Roehrborn Claus G, Karakiewicz Pierre I, Dhami Gurleen, Stage Key H
Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Texas 75390-9110, USA.
J Trauma. 2007 Apr;62(4):933-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318031ccf9.
To evaluate the predictive value of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) kidney injury scale for the management of traumatic renal injuries.
From October 1995 through October 2004, 424 patients presented to our hospital with traumatic renal injury.
Overall, 27.8% of patients had grade I injury, 26.4% had grade II injury, 19.3% had grade III injury, 18.2% had grade IV injury, and 8.3% had grade V injury. Patient age, Glasgow Coma Scale score, Revised Trauma Score, creatinine, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), white blood count, gender, substance abuse, shock, flank ecchymosis, abdominal pain, and mortality were not associated with AAST grade. Systolic blood pressure and hematocrit levels decreased with increasing AAST grades (p = 0.032 and p = 0.045, respectively). Volume transfused and length of hospitalization increased with AAST grades (p = 0.003 and p = 0.004, respectively). Patients with gunshot injury had higher AAST grades than those with blunt trauma (p < 0.001). Hypotension (14%), blood transfusion (47%), gross hematuria (65.9%), and flank pain (25%) were associated with higher AAST grades (p = 0.010, p < 0.001, p = 0.016, and p = 0.001, respectively). Ninety patients (21.2%) underwent renal exploration: 61% nephrectomies and 39% renorraphies. In multivariable analyses, type of injury, hematuria at presentation, and AAST scale predicted the risk of renal exploration (p < 0.001, p = 0.024, and p < 0.001, respectively), whereas type of injury and AAST scale were the sole predictors of nephrectomy (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively).
We confirmed that the AAST injury severity scale is a powerful and valid tool for prediction of clinical outcome in patients with renal trauma.
评估美国创伤外科协会(AAST)肾损伤分级对创伤性肾损伤治疗的预测价值。
1995年10月至2004年10月期间,424例创伤性肾损伤患者到我院就诊。
总体而言,27.8%的患者为Ⅰ级损伤,26.4%为Ⅱ级损伤,19.3%为Ⅲ级损伤,18.2%为Ⅳ级损伤,8.3%为Ⅴ级损伤。患者年龄、格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分、修订创伤评分、肌酐、血尿素氮(BUN)、白细胞计数、性别、药物滥用、休克、侧腹瘀斑、腹痛和死亡率与AAST分级无关。收缩压和血细胞比容水平随AAST分级增加而降低(分别为p = 0.032和p = 0.045)。输血量和住院时间随AAST分级增加而增加(分别为p = 0.003和p = 0.004)。枪伤患者的AAST分级高于钝性创伤患者(p < 0.001)。低血压(14%)、输血(47%)、肉眼血尿(65.9%)和侧腹疼痛(25%)与较高的AAST分级相关(分别为p = 0.010、p < 0.001、p = 0.016和p = 0.001)。90例患者(21.2%)接受了肾脏探查:61%为肾切除术,39%为肾修补术。在多变量分析中,损伤类型、就诊时血尿情况和AAST分级可预测肾脏探查风险(分别为p < 0.001、p = 0.024和p < 0.001),而损伤类型和AAST分级是肾切除术的唯一预测因素(分别为p < 0.001和p < 0.001)。
我们证实AAST损伤严重程度分级是预测肾创伤患者临床结局的有力且有效的工具。