Röttig Dörthe, Röttig Stephan, Brieger Peter, Marneros Andreas
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Martin-Luther-University of Halle-Wittenberg, Julius-Kuehn-Str. 07, 06097 Halle, Germany.
J Affect Disord. 2007 Dec;104(1-3):97-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2007.02.019. Epub 2007 Apr 10.
Personality and temperament are supposed to have an impact on the clinical expression and course of an affective disorder. There is some indication, that mixed episodes result from an admixture of inverse temperamental factors to a manic syndrome. In a preliminary report [Brieger, P., Roettig, S., Ehrt, U., Wenzel, A., Bloink, R., Marneros, A., 2003. TEMPS-a scale in 'mixed' and 'pure' manic episodes: new data and methodological considerations on the relevance of joint anxious-depressive temperament traits. J. Affect. Disord. 73, 99-104] we reported support for this assumption. The present study completes the preliminary results and compares patients with and without mixed episodes with respect to personality and personality disorders in addition.
Patients who had been hospitalized for bipolar I disorder were reassessed after 4.8 years. We examined temperament (TEMPS-A), personality (NEO-FFI) and frequency of personality disorders (SCID-II). Furthermore, illness-related parameters like age at first treatment, depressive and manic symptomatology, frequency and type of episodes and level of functioning were obtained and patients with and without mixed episodes were compared.
Patients with (n=49) and without mixed episodes (n=86) did not differ significantly with regard to the illness-related parameters and personality dimensions. The frequency of personality disorders was significantly higher in patients with prior mixed episodes. With respect to temperament, scores of the depressive, cyclothymic, irritable and anxious temperament were significantly higher in patients with mixed episodes.
We were not able to assess premorbid temperament and premorbid personality.
The findings of the present study support the assumption of Akiskal [Akiskal, H.S., 1992b. The distinctive mixed states of bipolar I, II, and III. Clin. Neuropharmacol. 15 Suppl 1 Pt A, 632-633.] that mixed episodes are more frequent in subjects with inverse temperament.
人格与气质被认为会对情感障碍的临床表现及病程产生影响。有迹象表明,混合发作是由相反气质因素混入躁狂综合征所致。在一份初步报告中[布里格,P.,罗蒂格,S.,埃尔特,U.,温泽尔,A.,布洛因克,R.,马内罗斯,A.,2003年。“TEMPS-a量表在‘混合’与‘单纯’躁狂发作中的应用:关于联合焦虑-抑郁气质特征相关性的新数据及方法学考量。《情感障碍杂志》73,99 - 104],我们报告了对这一假设的支持。本研究完善了初步结果,并额外比较了有和无混合发作的患者在人格及人格障碍方面的情况。
因双相I型障碍住院的患者在4.8年后接受重新评估。我们检查了气质(TEMPS - A)、人格(NEO - FFI)及人格障碍的频率(SCID - II)。此外,获取了与疾病相关的参数,如首次治疗年龄、抑郁和躁狂症状学、发作频率和类型以及功能水平,并对有和无混合发作的患者进行了比较。
有混合发作的患者(n = 49)和无混合发作的患者(n = 86)在与疾病相关的参数和人格维度方面无显著差异。既往有混合发作的患者中人格障碍的频率显著更高。在气质方面,有混合发作的患者在抑郁、环性心境、易激惹和焦虑气质的得分显著更高。
我们无法评估病前气质和病前人格。
本研究结果支持阿基斯卡尔[阿基斯卡尔,H.S.,1992b。双相I型、II型和III型的独特混合状态。《临床神经药理学》15增刊1 A部分,632 - 633]的假设,即相反气质的个体中混合发作更为常见。