Suppr超能文献

句子理解中的词汇歧义。

Lexical ambiguity in sentence comprehension.

作者信息

Mason Robert A, Just Marcel Adam

机构信息

Center for Cognitive Brain Imaging, Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.

出版信息

Brain Res. 2007 May 18;1146:115-27. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.02.076. Epub 2007 Mar 3.

Abstract

An event-related fMRI paradigm was used to investigate brain activity during the reading of sentences containing either a lexically ambiguous word or an unambiguous control word. Higher levels of activation occurred during the reading of sentences containing a lexical ambiguity. Furthermore, the activated cortical network differed, depending on: (1) whether the sentence contained a balanced (i.e., both meanings equally likely) or a biased (i.e., one meaning more likely than other meanings) ambiguous word; and, (2) the working memory capacity of the individual as assessed by reading span. The findings suggest that encountering a lexical ambiguity is dealt with by activating multiple meanings utilizing processes involving both hemispheres. When an early interpretation of a biased ambiguous word is later disambiguated to the subordinate meaning, the superior frontal cortex activates in response to the coherence break and the right inferior frontal gyrus and the insula activate, possibly to suppress the incorrect interpretation. Negative correlations between reading span scores and activation in the right hemisphere for both types of ambiguous words suggest that readers with lower spans are more likely to involve show right hemisphere involvement in the processing of the ambiguity. A positive correlation between reading span scores and insula activation appearing only for biased sentences disambiguated to the subordinate meaning indicates that individuals with higher spans were more likely to initially maintain both meanings and as a result had to suppress the unintended dominant meaning.

摘要

采用事件相关功能磁共振成像范式,研究在阅读包含词汇歧义或明确控制词的句子时的大脑活动。在阅读包含词汇歧义的句子时,激活水平更高。此外,激活的皮层网络有所不同,这取决于:(1)句子包含的是平衡(即两种意义可能性相同)还是偏向(即一种意义比其他意义更有可能)的歧义单词;以及(2)通过阅读广度评估的个体工作记忆容量。研究结果表明,遇到词汇歧义时,会通过激活涉及两个半球的过程来处理多种意义。当偏向歧义单词的早期解释后来被消除歧义而指向次要意义时,额上回会因连贯性中断而激活,右侧额下回和脑岛也会激活,可能是为了抑制错误的解释。两种歧义单词的阅读广度分数与右半球激活之间的负相关表明,阅读广度较低的读者在处理歧义时更有可能表现出右半球的参与。仅在偏向句子被消除歧义指向次要意义时出现的阅读广度分数与脑岛激活之间的正相关表明,阅读广度较高的个体更有可能最初保留两种意义,因此必须抑制意外的主导意义。

相似文献

1
Lexical ambiguity in sentence comprehension.
Brain Res. 2007 May 18;1146:115-27. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.02.076. Epub 2007 Mar 3.
2
Semantic ambiguity processing in sentence context: Evidence from event-related fMRI.
Neuroimage. 2007 Feb 1;34(3):1270-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.09.048. Epub 2006 Dec 4.
3
Readers use recent experiences with word meanings to support the processing of lexical ambiguity: Evidence from eye movements.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2025 Jul;51(7):1157-1177. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001418. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
4
An fMRI study of canonical and noncanonical word order in German.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2007 Oct;28(10):940-9. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20318.
5
Phonological ambiguity modulates resolution of semantic ambiguity during reading: An fMRI study of Hebrew.
Neuropsychology. 2017 Oct;31(7):759-777. doi: 10.1037/neu0000357. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
6
Tracking competition and cognitive control during language comprehension with multi-voxel pattern analysis.
Brain Lang. 2017 Feb;165:21-32. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2016.11.002. Epub 2016 Nov 27.
7
Roles of frontal and temporal regions in reinterpreting semantically ambiguous sentences.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Jul 29;8:530. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00530. eCollection 2014.
8
Context-dependent interpretation of words: evidence for interactive neural processes.
Neuroimage. 2007 Apr 15;35(3):1278-86. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.01.015. Epub 2007 Jan 27.
9
Hemispheric asymmetries in the resolution of lexical ambiguity.
Neuropsychologia. 2000;38(3):272-82. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(99)00076-7.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Widespread lack of article accessibility policies among ecology and evolution journals.
Nat Ecol Evol. 2025 Jun;9(6):900-907. doi: 10.1038/s41559-025-02694-8. Epub 2025 Apr 28.
2
Remapping and Reconnecting the Language Network after Stroke.
Brain Sci. 2024 Apr 24;14(5):419. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14050419.
3
Late dominance of the right hemisphere during narrative comprehension.
Neuroimage. 2022 Dec 1;264:119749. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119749. Epub 2022 Nov 13.
4
Change is hard: Individual differences in children's lexical processing and executive functions after a shift in dimensions.
Lang Learn Dev. 2022;18(2):229-247. doi: 10.1080/15475441.2021.1947289. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
6
Working memory and lexical ambiguity resolution in Cantonese Chinese.
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 10;16(3):e0248170. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248170. eCollection 2021.
7
The interaction between language and working memory: a systematic review of fMRI studies in the past two decades.
AIMS Neurosci. 2020 Nov 16;8(1):1-32. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2021001. eCollection 2021.
8
Decoding the Real-Time Neurobiological Properties of Incremental Semantic Interpretation.
Cereb Cortex. 2021 Jan 1;31(1):233-247. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhaa222.
9
Lack of selectivity for syntax relative to word meanings throughout the language network.
Cognition. 2020 Oct;203:104348. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104348. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
10
Barking up the right tree: Univariate and multivariate fMRI analyses of homonym comprehension.
Neuroimage. 2020 Oct 1;219:117050. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117050. Epub 2020 Jun 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Positron emission tomographic studies of the processing of singe words.
J Cogn Neurosci. 1989 Spring;1(2):153-70. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1989.1.2.153.
2
Role of Anterior and Posterior Attention Networks in Hemispheric Asymmetries during Lexical Decisions.
J Cogn Neurosci. 1991 Fall;3(4):313-21. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1991.3.4.313.
4
Summation priming and coarse semantic coding in the right hemisphere.
J Cogn Neurosci. 1994 Winter;6(1):26-45. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1994.6.1.26.
5
Distinct and common cortical activations for multimodal semantic categories.
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2006 Sep;6(3):214-22. doi: 10.3758/cabn.6.3.214.
7
The neural mechanisms of speech comprehension: fMRI studies of semantic ambiguity.
Cereb Cortex. 2005 Aug;15(8):1261-9. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhi009. Epub 2005 Jan 5.
8
Neural systems for word meaning modulated by semantic ambiguity.
Neuroimage. 2004 Jul;22(3):1128-33. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.02.034.
9
Activations of "motor" and other non-language structures during sentence comprehension.
Brain Lang. 2004 May;89(2):290-9. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00359-6.
10
Ambiguity in the brain: what brain imaging reveals about the processing of syntactically ambiguous sentences.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003 Nov;29(6):1319-38. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.6.1319.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验