Mason Robert A, Just Marcel Adam
Center for Cognitive Brain Imaging, Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Brain Res. 2007 May 18;1146:115-27. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.02.076. Epub 2007 Mar 3.
An event-related fMRI paradigm was used to investigate brain activity during the reading of sentences containing either a lexically ambiguous word or an unambiguous control word. Higher levels of activation occurred during the reading of sentences containing a lexical ambiguity. Furthermore, the activated cortical network differed, depending on: (1) whether the sentence contained a balanced (i.e., both meanings equally likely) or a biased (i.e., one meaning more likely than other meanings) ambiguous word; and, (2) the working memory capacity of the individual as assessed by reading span. The findings suggest that encountering a lexical ambiguity is dealt with by activating multiple meanings utilizing processes involving both hemispheres. When an early interpretation of a biased ambiguous word is later disambiguated to the subordinate meaning, the superior frontal cortex activates in response to the coherence break and the right inferior frontal gyrus and the insula activate, possibly to suppress the incorrect interpretation. Negative correlations between reading span scores and activation in the right hemisphere for both types of ambiguous words suggest that readers with lower spans are more likely to involve show right hemisphere involvement in the processing of the ambiguity. A positive correlation between reading span scores and insula activation appearing only for biased sentences disambiguated to the subordinate meaning indicates that individuals with higher spans were more likely to initially maintain both meanings and as a result had to suppress the unintended dominant meaning.
采用事件相关功能磁共振成像范式,研究在阅读包含词汇歧义或明确控制词的句子时的大脑活动。在阅读包含词汇歧义的句子时,激活水平更高。此外,激活的皮层网络有所不同,这取决于:(1)句子包含的是平衡(即两种意义可能性相同)还是偏向(即一种意义比其他意义更有可能)的歧义单词;以及(2)通过阅读广度评估的个体工作记忆容量。研究结果表明,遇到词汇歧义时,会通过激活涉及两个半球的过程来处理多种意义。当偏向歧义单词的早期解释后来被消除歧义而指向次要意义时,额上回会因连贯性中断而激活,右侧额下回和脑岛也会激活,可能是为了抑制错误的解释。两种歧义单词的阅读广度分数与右半球激活之间的负相关表明,阅读广度较低的读者在处理歧义时更有可能表现出右半球的参与。仅在偏向句子被消除歧义指向次要意义时出现的阅读广度分数与脑岛激活之间的正相关表明,阅读广度较高的个体更有可能最初保留两种意义,因此必须抑制意外的主导意义。