Semenzin Elena, Critto Andrea, Carlon Claudio, Rutgers Michiel, Marcomini Antonio
Department of Environmental Sciences and Centre IDEAS, University Ca' Foscari, Venice, Italy.
Sci Total Environ. 2007 Jun 15;379(1):34-45. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.02.034. Epub 2007 Apr 16.
A comparison procedure based on Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) and expert judgment was developed in order to allow the comparison of bioavailability tests to implement the chemical Line of Evidence (LoE) within a TRIAD based site-specific Ecological Risk Assessment framework including three tires of investigation. The proposed methodology was included in the Module 1 of the Decision Support System DSS-ERAMANIA and the obtained rank supported the selection of a suitable set of available tests to be applied to the case study. A simplified application of the proposed procedure is described and results obtained by the system software are discussed.
为了能够在基于三元组的特定场地生态风险评估框架(包括三个调查层级)内比较生物利用度测试,以实施化学证据链(LoE),开发了一种基于多标准决策分析(MCDA)和专家判断的比较程序。所提出的方法被纳入决策支持系统DSS - ERAMANIA的模块1中,所得排名为案例研究选择合适的可用测试集提供了支持。文中描述了所提程序的简化应用,并讨论了系统软件获得的结果。