Fernández María Dolores, Vega María Milagrosa, Tarazona José Vicente
Laboratory for Ecotoxicology, Department of the Environment, INIA, Ctra. A Coruña, km. 7,5, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Sci Total Environ. 2006 Aug 1;366(2-3):466-84. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.01.013. Epub 2006 Mar 29.
This paper describes the development of soil quality criteria for the characterization of soils focused on the potential risk to the ecosystem. The approach combines both Generic Soil Quality standards (GSQs) for individual chemicals and direct ecotoxicity assays on soil samples taken from the site. Criteria establish three main risk levels with their corresponding trigger values. The trigger values to determine high risk or "polluted" soils are exclusively based on direct toxicity assessments. The trigger values for the other categories are established by a combination of the application of GSQs and the results of bioassays. Low-risk is assumed when no toxicity is observed and GSQs based on precautionary ecotoxicity thresholds are not exceeded; high-risk must be considered if acute toxicity above the proposed trigger value is observed in soil or leachate samples. In between these levels, the risk cannot be elucidated and a site-specific assessment is required. The GSQs take into account the current or future land use, thus defining three categories: industrial soils, urban/residential soils and natural/agricultural/forest soils, each of them with different ecological requirements. The GSQ values are established following an inverse risk assessment methodology, integrating ecotoxicity and exposure models and setting the soil levels associated to pre-established criteria for the assumption of low risk. The proposed methodology covers all relevant ecological receptors and processes, soil organisms, potential contamination of ground and surface waters, and exposure of terrestrial vertebrates due to bioaccumulation and biomagnification. Exposure routes and protection criteria are defined in each protection goal. The relevance of each receptor and route is established according to the land use.
本文描述了针对土壤质量标准的制定,该标准着重于土壤对生态系统的潜在风险特征。此方法结合了针对单一化学物质的通用土壤质量标准(GSQs)以及对取自现场的土壤样本进行的直接生态毒性测定。标准设定了三个主要风险级别及其相应的触发值。用于确定高风险或“污染”土壤的触发值完全基于直接毒性评估。其他类别的触发值则通过综合应用GSQs和生物测定结果来确定。当未观察到毒性且未超过基于预防性生态毒性阈值的GSQs时,假定为低风险;如果在土壤或渗滤液样本中观察到高于提议触发值的急性毒性,则必须考虑高风险。在这两个级别之间,风险无法明确,需要进行特定场地评估。GSQs考虑了当前或未来的土地用途,从而定义了三类:工业土壤、城市/住宅土壤以及自然/农业/森林土壤,每类都有不同的生态要求。GSQ值是按照反向风险评估方法确定的,整合了生态毒性和暴露模型,并设定了与预先确定的低风险标准相关的土壤水平。所提议的方法涵盖了所有相关的生态受体和过程、土壤生物、地下水和地表水的潜在污染以及由于生物累积和生物放大作用导致的陆地脊椎动物暴露。在每个保护目标中都定义了暴露途径和保护标准。每个受体和途径的相关性根据土地用途来确定。