• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分析性思维与整体性思维的个体差异。

Individual differences in analytic versus holistic thinking.

作者信息

Choi Incheol, Koo Minkyung

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Seoul National University, Korea.

出版信息

Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2007 May;33(5):691-705. doi: 10.1177/0146167206298568. Epub 2007 Apr 17.

DOI:10.1177/0146167206298568
PMID:17440200
Abstract

The authors constructed the Analysis-Holism Scale (AHS) to measure analytic versus holistic thinking tendency. In Study 1, using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, a 24-item scale was developed. In Study 2, convergent and discriminant validities were tested. In Studies 3 and 4, the known-group difference validity was examined by comparing scores on the AHS of Americans and Koreans (Study 3) and of Korean students of Oriental medicine and Korean students of non-Oriental medicine majors (Study 4). Results of Studies 3 and 4 show that Koreans and Korean students of Oriental medicine scored higher on the AHS than did Americans and Korean students of non-Oriental medicine majors, respectively. Studies 5 and 6 tested predictive validity by examining associations of the AHS with performances on two cognitive tasks (categorization and causal reasoning). Data analysis shows that those with high scores on the AHS displayed the holistic pattern of performances on each task more than did those with low scores.

摘要

作者构建了分析-整体主义量表(AHS)来测量分析性思维与整体性思维倾向。在研究1中,通过探索性和验证性因素分析,编制了一个包含24个条目的量表。在研究2中,对聚合效度和区分效度进行了检验。在研究3和研究4中,通过比较美国人和韩国人(研究3)以及韩国东方医学专业学生和非东方医学专业韩国学生在AHS上的得分,检验了已知群体差异效度。研究3和研究4的结果表明,韩国人和韩国东方医学专业学生在AHS上的得分分别高于美国人和非东方医学专业韩国学生。研究5和研究6通过检验AHS与两项认知任务(分类和因果推理)表现之间的关联,测试了预测效度。数据分析表明,AHS得分高的人在每项任务上比得分低的人更表现出整体性的表现模式。

相似文献

1
Individual differences in analytic versus holistic thinking.分析性思维与整体性思维的个体差异。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2007 May;33(5):691-705. doi: 10.1177/0146167206298568. Epub 2007 Apr 17.
2
Becoming a holistic thinker: training effect of oriental medicine on reasoning.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2005 Sep;31(9):1264-72. doi: 10.1177/0146167205274692.
3
What is the source of cultural differences? -- Examining the influence of thinking style on the attribution process.文化差异的根源是什么?——探究思维方式对归因过程的影响。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Feb;133(2):154-62. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.10.011. Epub 2009 Nov 27.
4
East meets West: a search for holism in Korean nursing practice.东方与西方相遇:探寻韩国护理实践中的整体观。
J Holist Nurs. 2005 Sep;23(3):356-62. doi: 10.1177/0898010105277653.
5
Holistic reasoning on the other side of the world: validation of the analysis-holism scale in Mexicans.世界另一边的整体推理:分析-整体论量表在墨西哥人中的验证。
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2011 Jul;17(3):325-30. doi: 10.1037/a0023881.
6
[Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the coping inventory for stressful situations (CISS): a contribution to the cross-cultural studies of coping].压力情境应对量表(CISS)日文版的信效度:对应对方式跨文化研究的贡献
Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi. 1993;95(8):602-20.
7
Verification of the profile of mood states-brief: cross-cultural analysis.简式情绪状态剖面图的验证:跨文化分析
J Clin Psychol. 2006 Sep;62(9):1173-80. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20269.
8
Affective facilitation and inhibition of cultural influences on reasoning.情感促进和抑制文化对推理的影响。
Cogn Emot. 2012;26(4):680-9. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2011.613920. Epub 2011 Nov 14.
9
Factor structure and internal consistency of the Young Schema Questionnaire (Short Form) in Korean and Australian samples.韩国和澳大利亚样本中青少年图式问卷(简版)的因子结构与内部一致性
J Affect Disord. 2006 Jul;93(1-3):133-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2006.03.003. Epub 2006 May 2.
10
Reynolds Adolescent Depression Scale - Second Edition: initial validation of the Korean version.雷诺兹青少年抑郁量表第二版:韩语版的初步验证
J Adv Nurs. 2009 Mar;65(3):642-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04913.x.

引用本文的文献

1
A two-factor scale of perceived power.一个感知权力的双因素量表。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 28;20(2):e0319412. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319412. eCollection 2025.
2
Validation and Application of Functions of Future Thinking Scale in Chinese Adults.未来思维量表功能在中国成年人中的验证与应用
Psych J. 2025 Apr;14(2):244-257. doi: 10.1002/pchj.819. Epub 2024 Dec 8.
3
The Wise Mind Balances the Abstract and the Concrete.明智的头脑平衡抽象与具体。
Open Mind (Camb). 2024 Jun 28;8:826-858. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00149. eCollection 2024.
4
How emotions shape memory? The moderating effect of healthy emotionality on eyewitness testimony.情绪如何塑造记忆?健康情绪对目击证人证词的调节作用。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jun 6;15:1406897. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1406897. eCollection 2024.
5
Cross-cultural study of hotel practices as perceived by Chinese and North American travellers: A data mining analysis.中国和北美旅行者对酒店服务的跨文化研究:数据挖掘分析
Heliyon. 2024 May 27;10(11):e31883. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31883. eCollection 2024 Jun 15.
6
Analytic-holistic cognitive styles affect consumer responses to food and beverage samples during sensory evaluation.分析-整体认知风格会影响消费者在感官评价过程中对食品和饮料样品的反应。
Curr Res Food Sci. 2023 Nov 10;8:100635. doi: 10.1016/j.crfs.2023.100635. eCollection 2024.
7
The role of attitudes towards contradiction in psychological resilience: the cortical mechanism of conflicting resolution networks.态度在心理弹性中的作用:矛盾解决网络的皮层机制。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 18;14(1):1669. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-51722-3.
8
Coping with mortality salience: the role of connection thinking and afterlife beliefs in Chinese context.应对死亡突显:联结思维与来世信念在中国背景下的作用
Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 22;14:1190906. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1190906. eCollection 2023.
9
Coaches' Perceptions of Factors Driving Training Adaptation: An International Survey.教练对推动培训适应因素的看法:一项国际调查。
Sports Med. 2023 Dec;53(12):2505-2512. doi: 10.1007/s40279-023-01894-1. Epub 2023 Aug 8.
10
Lay Misperceptions of Culture as "Biological" and Suggestions for Reducing Them.文化的错误观念被认为是“生物学”的,以及减少这些错误观念的建议。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2024 Jan;19(1):295-311. doi: 10.1177/17456916231181139. Epub 2023 Jul 26.