• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

明智的头脑平衡抽象与具体。

The Wise Mind Balances the Abstract and the Concrete.

作者信息

Grossmann Igor, Peetz Johanna, Dorfman Anna, Rotella Amanda, Buehler Roger

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.

Psychology Department, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Open Mind (Camb). 2024 Jun 28;8:826-858. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00149. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1162/opmi_a_00149
PMID:38974582
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11226238/
Abstract

We explored how individuals' mental representations of complex and uncertain situations impact their ability to reason wisely. To this end, we introduce situated methods to capture abstract and concrete mental representations and the switching between them when reflecting on social challenges. Using these methods, we evaluated the alignment of abstractness and concreteness with four integral facets of wisdom: intellectual humility, open-mindedness, perspective-taking, and compromise-seeking. Data from North American and UK participants ( = 1,151) revealed that both abstract and concrete construals significantly contribute to wise reasoning, even when controlling for a host of relevant covariates and potential response bias. Natural language processing of unstructured texts among high (top 25%) and low (bottom 25%) wisdom participants corroborated these results: semantic networks of the high wisdom group reveal greater use of both abstract and concrete themes compared to the low wisdom group. Finally, employing a repeated strategy-choice method as an additional measure, our findings demonstrated that individuals who showed a greater balance and switching between these construal types exhibited higher wisdom. Our findings advance understanding of individual differences in mental representations and how construals shape reasoning across contexts in everyday life.

摘要

我们探究了个体对复杂和不确定情况的心理表征如何影响他们明智推理的能力。为此,我们引入情境方法来捕捉抽象和具体的心理表征,以及在思考社会挑战时它们之间的转换。使用这些方法,我们评估了抽象性和具体性与智慧的四个不可或缺的方面的一致性:智识谦逊、开放性思维、换位思考和寻求妥协。来自北美和英国参与者((n = 1151))的数据表明,即使在控制了一系列相关协变量和潜在反应偏差的情况下,抽象和具体的解释都对明智推理有显著贡献。对高智慧(前25%)和低智慧(后25%)参与者的非结构化文本进行自然语言处理证实了这些结果:与低智慧组相比,高智慧组的语义网络显示出对抽象和具体主题的更多使用。最后,采用重复策略选择方法作为额外的衡量标准,我们的研究结果表明,在这些解释类型之间表现出更大平衡和转换的个体表现出更高的智慧。我们的研究结果推进了对心理表征个体差异的理解,以及解释如何在日常生活中跨情境塑造推理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54ba/11226238/017b07144f6f/opmi-08-826-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54ba/11226238/b1d0bc11ebe9/opmi-08-826-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54ba/11226238/358ef9afd24a/opmi-08-826-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54ba/11226238/017b07144f6f/opmi-08-826-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54ba/11226238/b1d0bc11ebe9/opmi-08-826-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54ba/11226238/358ef9afd24a/opmi-08-826-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54ba/11226238/017b07144f6f/opmi-08-826-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
The Wise Mind Balances the Abstract and the Concrete.明智的头脑平衡抽象与具体。
Open Mind (Camb). 2024 Jun 28;8:826-858. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00149. eCollection 2024.
2
"Wisdom, bias, and balance: Toward a process-sensitive measurement of wisdom-related cognition": Correction to Brienza et al. (2017).“智慧、偏见和平衡:走向对与智慧相关认知的敏感过程测量”: Brienza 等人(2017)的勘误。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2018 Dec;115(6):943. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000234.
3
Wisdom, bias, and balance: Toward a process-sensitive measurement of wisdom-related cognition.智慧、偏见和平衡:走向对与智慧相关认知的敏感过程测量。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2018 Dec;115(6):1093-1126. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000171. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
4
Training for Wisdom: The Distanced-Self-Reflection Diary Method.培养智慧:离身自我反思日记法。
Psychol Sci. 2021 Mar;32(3):381-394. doi: 10.1177/0956797620969170. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
5
Neural Representations of Concreteness and Concrete Concepts Are Specific to the Individual.具体概念和具体概念的神经表示因人而异。
J Neurosci. 2024 Nov 6;44(45):e0288242024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0288-24.2024.
6
Wisdom is a social-ecological rather than person-centric phenomenon.智慧是一种社会-生态现象,而不是以人为中心的现象。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2020 Apr;32:66-71. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.07.010. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
7
Wisdom in Context.情境中的智慧。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2017 Mar;12(2):233-257. doi: 10.1177/1745691616672066.
8
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
9
The Wisdom in Virtue: Pursuit of Virtue Predicts Wise Reasoning About Personal Conflicts.美德的智慧:对个人冲突进行明智推理的美德追求。
Psychol Sci. 2017 Dec;28(12):1848-1856. doi: 10.1177/0956797617722621. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
10
Deconstructing wisdom through a cultural lens: Folk understandings of wisdom and its ontology in the Philippines and Sri Lanka.从文化视角解构智慧:菲律宾和斯里兰卡民众对智慧及其本体的理解
Transcult Psychiatry. 2024 Oct;61(5):767-782. doi: 10.1177/13634615241233682. Epub 2024 Feb 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Abstract and concrete concepts in conversation.会话中的抽象概念和具体概念。
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 20;12(1):17572. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-20785-5.
2
Predictors and consequences of intellectual humility.智识谦逊的预测因素及后果。
Nat Rev Psychol. 2022;1(9):524-536. doi: 10.1038/s44159-022-00081-9. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
3
"I" am more concrete than "we": Linguistic abstraction and first-person pronoun usage.“我”比“我们”更具体:语言抽象与第一人称代词的使用。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2022 Jun;122(6):1004-1021. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000285. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
4
Thematic and other semantic relations central to abstract (and concrete) concepts.与抽象(和具体)概念相关的主题和其他语义关系。
Psychol Res. 2022 Nov;86(8):2399-2416. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01484-8. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
5
Wise reasoning, intergroup positivity, and attitude polarization across contexts.明智的推理、群体间的积极性和跨情境的态度极化。
Nat Commun. 2021 Jun 3;12(1):3313. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23432-1.
6
Training for Wisdom: The Distanced-Self-Reflection Diary Method.培养智慧:离身自我反思日记法。
Psychol Sci. 2021 Mar;32(3):381-394. doi: 10.1177/0956797620969170. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
7
Regulatory Scope and Its Mental and Social Supports.监管范围及其心理和社会支持。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2021 Mar;16(2):204-224. doi: 10.1177/1745691620950691. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
8
On abstraction: decoupling conceptual concreteness and categorical specificity.论抽象:解耦概念具体性与范畴特异性。
Cogn Process. 2020 Aug;21(3):365-381. doi: 10.1007/s10339-020-00965-9. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
9
Folk standards of sound judgment: Rationality Versus Reasonableness.民间的合理判断标准:理性与合理性。
Sci Adv. 2020 Jan 8;6(2):eaaz0289. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaz0289. eCollection 2020 Jan.
10
Above and beyond the concrete: The diverse representational substrates of the predictive brain.超越具体:预测大脑的多样表现基质。
Behav Brain Sci. 2019 Jul 18;43:e121. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X19002000.