Clancy Dawn E, Huang Peng, Okonofua Eni, Yeager Derik, Magruder Kathryn Marley
Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 250591, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 May;22(5):620-4. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0150-3. Epub 2007 Mar 8.
Current diabetes management guidelines offer blueprints for providers, yet type 2 diabetes control is often poor in disadvantaged populations. The group visit is a new treatment modality originating in managed care for efficient service delivery to patients with chronic health problems. Group visits offer promise for delivering care to diabetic patients, as visits are lengthier and can be more frequent, more organized, and more educational.
To evaluate the effect of group visits on clinical outcomes, concordance with 10 American Diabetes Association (ADA) guidelines [American Diabetes Association, Diabetes Care, 28:S4-36, 2004] and 3 United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) cancer screens [U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/uspstf/resource.htm, 2003].
A 12-month randomized controlled trial of 186 diabetic patients comparing care in group visits with care in the traditional patient-physician dyad. Clinical outcomes (HbA1c, blood pressure [BP], lipid profiles) were assessed at 6 and 12 months and quality of care measures (adherence to 10 ADA guidelines and 3 USPSTF cancer screens) at 12 months.
At both measurement points, HbA1c, BP, and lipid levels did not differ significantly for patients attending group visits versus those in usual care. At 12 months, however, patients receiving care in group visits exhibited greater concordance with ADA process-of-care indicators (p < .0001) and higher screening rates for cancers of the breast (80 vs. 68%, p = .006) and cervix (80 vs 68%, p = .019).
Group visits can improve the quality of care for diabetic patients, but modifications to the content and style of group visits may be necessary to achieve improved clinical outcomes.
当前的糖尿病管理指南为医疗服务提供者提供了蓝本,但在弱势群体中,2型糖尿病的控制情况往往较差。小组就诊是一种起源于管理式医疗的新治疗模式,旨在为患有慢性健康问题的患者高效提供服务。小组就诊有望为糖尿病患者提供护理,因为就诊时间更长,且可以更频繁、更有组织、更具教育性。
评估小组就诊对临床结局的影响,以及与美国糖尿病协会(ADA)的10项指南[美国糖尿病协会,《糖尿病护理》,28:S4 - 36,2004年]和美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)的3项癌症筛查[美国预防服务工作组,http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/uspstf/resource.htm,2003年]的符合程度。
对186名糖尿病患者进行为期12个月的随机对照试验,比较小组就诊护理与传统医患二元护理。在6个月和12个月时评估临床结局(糖化血红蛋白、血压[BP]、血脂谱),并在12个月时评估护理质量指标(遵守10项ADA指南和3项USPSTF癌症筛查)。
在两个测量点,参加小组就诊的患者与接受常规护理的患者相比,糖化血红蛋白、血压和血脂水平均无显著差异。然而,在12个月时,接受小组就诊护理的患者与ADA护理流程指标的符合程度更高(p < .0001),乳腺癌(80%对68%,p = .006)和宫颈癌(80%对68%,p = .019)的筛查率更高。
小组就诊可以提高糖尿病患者的护理质量,但可能需要对小组就诊的内容和方式进行调整,以实现更好的临床结局。