Suppr超能文献

通过对未参保或参保不足的患者群体进行小组访视,评估其与美国糖尿病协会2型糖尿病护理标准的一致性。

Evaluating concordance to American Diabetes Association standards of care for type 2 diabetes through group visits in an uninsured or inadequately insured patient population.

作者信息

Clancy Dawn E, Cope Dennis W, Magruder Kathryn Marley, Huang Peng, Wolfman Tamara E

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina 29425, USA.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2003 Jul;26(7):2032-6. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.7.2032.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of a managed care approach to health care delivery, group visits, in the management of uninsured or inadequately insured patients with type 2 diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A total of 120 patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes were randomly assigned to receive their care in group visits or usual care for 6 months. After 6 months, concordance with 10 process-of-care indicators recommended by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) standards of care was evaluated through chart abstraction. The 10 items evaluated were up-to-date HbA(1c) levels and lipid profiles, urine for microalbumin, appropriate use of ACE inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blockers, use of lipid-lowering agents where indicated, daily aspirin use, annual foot examinations, annual referrals for retinal examinations, and immunizations against streptococcal pneumonia and influenza.

RESULTS

Patients who received care in group visits showed statistically significant improvement in concordance with these 10 process-of-care indicators (P < 0.001). Of the patients, 76% who received care in group visits had at least 9 of these 10 items up to date, as compared with 23% of control patients; 86% of patients in group visits had at least 8 of the 10 indicators compared with 47% of control patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Group visits proved more effective in promoting concordance with ADA standards of care than usual care in the treatment of uninsured or inadequately insured patients with type 2 diabetes.

摘要

目的

评估一种管理式医疗保健服务方式——小组就诊,在管理未参保或参保不足的2型糖尿病患者中的有效性。

研究设计与方法

总共120例2型糖尿病控制不佳的患者被随机分配接受为期6个月的小组就诊护理或常规护理。6个月后,通过病历摘要评估与美国糖尿病协会(ADA)护理标准推荐的10项护理过程指标的符合情况。评估的10项内容为最新的糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平和血脂谱、尿微量白蛋白、适当使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂、在有指征时使用降脂药物、每日服用阿司匹林、年度足部检查、年度视网膜检查转诊以及针对肺炎链球菌和流感的免疫接种。

结果

接受小组就诊护理的患者在这10项护理过程指标的符合情况方面有统计学意义的改善(P<0.001)。接受小组就诊护理的患者中,76%的患者这10项内容中的至少9项是最新的,而对照组患者为23%;小组就诊患者中86%的患者至少符合10项指标中的8项,而对照组患者为47%。

结论

在治疗未参保或参保不足的2型糖尿病患者中,小组就诊在促进符合ADA护理标准方面比常规护理更有效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验