Suppr超能文献

工作场所健康促进项目在控制高血压、减肥和戒烟方面的成本效益。

The cost-effectiveness of work-site wellness programs for hypertension control, weight loss, and smoking cessation.

作者信息

Erfurt J C, Foote A, Heirich M A

机构信息

Institute of Labor and Industrial Relations, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109-2054.

出版信息

J Occup Med. 1991 Sep;33(9):962-70.

PMID:1744745
Abstract

The cost-effectiveness of work-site wellness programs for reducing cardiovascular disease risks of employees was examined at three manufacturing plants. A fourth plant was used as a control site to estimate levels of risk reduction achieved from wellness screening and preexisting services, without further interventions. The cardiovascular disease risks included in the study were hypertension, obesity, and cigarette smoking. The annual direct cost per employee for postscreening interventions was $2.97 for site 1 (control site), $17.68 for site 2 (health education), $30.96 for site 3 (health education plus follow-up counseling), and $38.31 for site 4 (health education, follow-up counseling plus plant organization for health promotion). Of the three experimental sites, sites 3 and 4 were more effective and more cost-effective than was site 2, both in terms of engaging employees at risk of cardiovascular disease into treatment or program participation and of reducing their risks or preventing relapse. For engaging employees into treatment/program participation, sites 3 and 4 were nine to ten times more cost-effective than was site 2; for reducing risks/preventing relapse, sites 3 and 4 were five to six times more cost-effective than was site 2. At sites 3 and 4, the total direct cost per percent of risks reduced/relapse prevented was less than one dollar ($.67 and $.74, respectively) per employee per year. Program costs may vary considerably across companies because of differences in salary structures and overhead costs. These are held constant in this report for comparison across program models.

摘要

在三家制造工厂对工作场所健康计划降低员工心血管疾病风险的成本效益进行了研究。第四家工厂用作对照点,以估计在没有进一步干预的情况下,通过健康筛查和现有服务实现的风险降低水平。该研究纳入的心血管疾病风险包括高血压、肥胖和吸烟。筛查后干预措施的每位员工年度直接成本,1号工厂(对照点)为2.97美元,2号工厂(健康教育)为17.68美元,3号工厂(健康教育加后续咨询)为30.96美元,4号工厂(健康教育、后续咨询加工厂健康促进组织)为38.31美元。在三个试验点中,就促使有心血管疾病风险的员工接受治疗或参与计划以及降低他们的风险或预防复发而言,3号和4号工厂比2号工厂更有效且更具成本效益。在促使员工接受治疗/参与计划方面,3号和4号工厂的成本效益比2号工厂高9至10倍;在降低风险/预防复发方面,3号和4号工厂的成本效益比2号工厂高5至6倍。在3号和4号工厂,每降低/预防百分之一风险的每位员工每年总直接成本不到1美元(分别为0.67美元和0.74美元)。由于薪资结构和间接费用的差异,不同公司的计划成本可能有很大差异。本报告中这些因素保持不变,以便在不同计划模式之间进行比较。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验