Malan C A, Wilkes A R, Hall J E, Gildersleve C
Department of Anaesthetics and Intensive Care Medicine, Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff University, UK.
Anaesthesia. 2007 May;62(5):504-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05035.x.
The filtration performance of five different types of filter intended for use in paediatric anaesthesia was measured. A total of 120 unused filters (24 samples of each filter type) were evaluated. The pressure drop and filtration performance, using challenges of sodium chloride particles, were measured for each filter at 3 l min(-1) and 15 l min(-1). The pressure drop was less at the lower flow; there was a wide variation in the pressure drop across some filters. The filtration performance of all filter types showed an improvement at 3 l min(-1) compared to 15 l min(-1). Four filter types had filtration efficiencies greater than 95% at 15 l min(-1) and greater than 99% at 3 l min(-1). The remaining filter type had a filtration efficiency less than 90% at 15 l min(-1) and greater than 95% at 3 l min(-1). These levels of performance are comparable to that of breathing system filters intended for use in adult anaesthesia using flows representing mean inspiratory flow.
对五种不同类型的用于儿科麻醉的过滤器的过滤性能进行了测量。总共评估了120个未使用过的过滤器(每种过滤器类型24个样本)。使用氯化钠颗粒进行挑战,在3 l min(-1)和15 l min(-1)的流量下测量每个过滤器的压降和过滤性能。较低流量下的压降较小;一些过滤器的压降存在很大差异。与15 l min(-1)相比,所有过滤器类型在3 l min(-1)时的过滤性能均有所提高。四种过滤器类型在15 l min(-1)时的过滤效率大于95%,在3 l min(-1)时大于99%。其余过滤器类型在15 l min(-1)时的过滤效率小于90%,在3 l min(-1)时大于95%。这些性能水平与使用代表平均吸气流量的流量的成人麻醉用呼吸系统过滤器的性能水平相当。