• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经椎间植入治疗伴有节段性不稳的退变性腰椎管狭窄症的一年期疗效评估

One-year outcome evaluation after interspinous implantation for degenerative spinal stenosis with segmental instability.

作者信息

Kong Doo-Sik, Kim Eun-Sang, Eoh Whan

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 50 Ilwon-dong, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Korean Med Sci. 2007 Apr;22(2):330-5. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2007.22.2.330.

DOI:10.3346/jkms.2007.22.2.330
PMID:17449945
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2693603/
Abstract

The authors hypothesized that the placement of the interspinous implant would show a similar clinical outcome to the posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in patients having spinal stenosis with mild segmental instability and that this method would be superior to PLIF without significantly affecting degeneration at the adjacent segments. Forty two adult patients having degenerative spinal stenosis with mild segmental instability who underwent implantation of Coflex (Spine motion, Germany) or PLIF at L4-5 between January 2000 and December 2003 were consecutively selected and studied for one-year clinical outcome. At 12 months after surgery, both groups showed a significant improvement in the visual analogue scale score and Oswestry disability index score for both lower extremity pain and low back pain. However, the range of motion at the upper adjacent segments (L3-4) increased significantly after surgery in the PLIF group, which was not manifested in the Coflex group during the follow-up. The authors assumed that interspinous implantation can be an alternative treatment for the spinal stenosis with segmental instability in selected conditions posing less stress on the superior adjacent level than PLIF.

摘要

作者们推测,对于患有轻度节段性不稳定的腰椎管狭窄症患者,棘突间植入物的置入将显示出与后路腰椎椎间融合术(PLIF)相似的临床效果,并且该方法在不显著影响相邻节段退变的情况下优于PLIF。连续选取了42例在2000年1月至2003年12月期间于L4 - 5节段接受Coflex(德国脊柱运动公司)植入或PLIF手术的患有退行性腰椎管狭窄症且伴有轻度节段性不稳定的成年患者,并对其进行了为期一年的临床效果研究。术后12个月时,两组患者的视觉模拟量表评分以及下肢疼痛和腰痛的Oswestry功能障碍指数评分均有显著改善。然而,PLIF组术后上相邻节段(L3 - 4)的活动度显著增加,而在随访期间Coflex组未出现这种情况。作者认为,在特定条件下,棘突间植入术可作为节段性不稳定腰椎管狭窄症的一种替代治疗方法,与PLIF相比,其对上位相邻节段施加的应力更小。

相似文献

1
One-year outcome evaluation after interspinous implantation for degenerative spinal stenosis with segmental instability.经椎间植入治疗伴有节段性不稳的退变性腰椎管狭窄症的一年期疗效评估
J Korean Med Sci. 2007 Apr;22(2):330-5. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2007.22.2.330.
2
Evaluation of Coflex interspinous stabilization following decompression compared with decompression and posterior lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease: A minimum 5-year follow-up study.减压术后Coflex棘突间稳定系统与减压及后路腰椎椎间融合术治疗腰椎退行性疾病的比较:一项至少5年的随访研究。
J Clin Neurosci. 2017 Jan;35:24-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2016.09.030. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
3
Spinopelvic alignment after interspinous soft stabilization with a tension band system in grade 1 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.在 1 级退变性腰椎滑脱症中,使用张力带系统进行棘间软组织稳定后的脊柱骨盆对线。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Jul 1;35(15):E691-701. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d2607e.
4
Comparison of the effect of posterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screw fixation and interspinous fixation on the stiffness of adjacent segments.后路腰椎体间融合联合椎弓根螺钉固定与棘突间固定对邻近节段刚度影响的比较。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2013;126(9):1732-7.
5
The impact of generalized joint laxity on the clinical and radiological outcomes of single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion.全身关节松弛对单节段腰椎后路椎间融合术临床及影像学结果的影响。
Spine J. 2015 May 1;15(5):809-16. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.12.013. Epub 2014 Dec 15.
6
Two-year results of interspinous spacer (X-Stop) implantation in 175 patients with neurologic intermittent claudication due to lumbar spinal stenosis.175例因腰椎管狭窄导致神经源性间歇性跛行患者行棘突间撑开器(X-Stop)植入术的两年结果。
Eur Spine J. 2009 Jun;18(6):823-9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-0967-z. Epub 2009 Apr 22.
7
X-Stop interspinous implant for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Our experience after 50 consecutive patients.用于治疗腰椎管狭窄症的X-Stop棘突间植入物。我们连续50例患者后的经验。
G Chir. 2010 May;31(5):247-50.
8
Two-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative disc disease: improved clinical outcome with restoration of lumbar lordosis.两级后路腰椎椎间融合术治疗椎间盘退变疾病:通过恢复腰椎前凸改善临床疗效
Spine J. 2005 Nov-Dec;5(6):600-7. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2005.04.001.
9
[The clinical results of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis with lumbar instability].[微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术治疗腰椎管狭窄症合并腰椎不稳的临床疗效]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Dec;49(12):1081-5.
10
Stress fracture of bilateral posterior facet after insertion of interspinous implant.棘突间植入物置入后双侧小关节应力性骨折。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 May 1;34(10):E380-3. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819fd3a0.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of iatrogenic alterations on adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar fusion surgery: a systematic review.腰椎融合术后医源性改变对相邻节段退变的影响:一项系统综述
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Apr 29;20(1):425. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05561-1.
2
Coflex Interspinous Stabilization with Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: An Average 14-Year Follow-Up.Coflex棘突间稳定术联合减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症:平均14年随访
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 21;14(8):2856. doi: 10.3390/jcm14082856.
3
Bibliometric analysis of interspinous device in treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases.

本文引用的文献

1
Rigid, semirigid versus dynamic instrumentation for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a correlative radiological and clinical analysis of short-term results.退行性腰椎管狭窄症的刚性、半刚性与动态内固定:短期结果的相关影像学与临床分析
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Apr 1;29(7):735-42. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000112072.83196.0f.
2
An interspinous process distractor (X STOP) for lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly patients: preliminary experiences in 10 consecutive cases.用于老年患者腰椎管狭窄症的棘突间撑开器(X STOP):连续10例的初步经验。
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2004 Feb;17(1):72-7; discussion 78. doi: 10.1097/00024720-200402000-00013.
3
棘突间装置治疗腰椎退行性疾病的文献计量分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Mar 1;103(9):e37351. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037351.
4
Complications and radiographic changes after implantation of interspinous process devices: average eight-year follow-up.棘突间装置植入后的并发症和影像学改变:平均八年随访。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Aug 23;24(1):667. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06798-9.
5
Validity of outcome measures used in randomized clinical trials and observational studies in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.用于退行性腰椎管狭窄症随机临床试验和观察性研究的结局测量的有效性。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 19;13(1):1068. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-27218-3.
6
Biomechanical comparison of different interspinous process devices in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a finite element analysis.不同棘突间装置治疗腰椎管狭窄症的生物力学比较:有限元分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Jun 17;23(1):585. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05543-y.
7
A Differential Clinical Benefit Examination of Full Lumbar Endoscopy vs Interspinous Process Spacers in the Treatment of Spinal Stenosis: An Effect Size Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes.全腰椎内镜与棘突间撑开器治疗腰椎管狭窄症的临床疗效差异比较:临床结局的效应量Meta分析
Int J Spine Surg. 2022 Feb;16(1):102-123. doi: 10.14444/8200. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
8
The use of minimally invasive interspinous process devices for the treatment of lumbar canal stenosis: a narrative literature review.使用微创棘突间装置治疗腰椎管狭窄症:一篇叙述性文献综述。
J Spine Surg. 2021 Sep;7(3):394-412. doi: 10.21037/jss-21-57.
9
Interspinous process devices for treatment of degenerative lumbar spine stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.棘突间装置治疗退行性腰椎管狭窄症:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 6;13(7):e0199623. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199623. eCollection 2018.
10
Length of stay, costs, and complications in lumbar disc herniation surgery by standard PLIF versus a new dynamic interspinous stabilization technique.标准后路腰椎椎间融合术(PLIF)与新型动态棘突间稳定技术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的住院时间、费用及并发症
Patient Saf Surg. 2017 Nov 23;11:26. doi: 10.1186/s13037-017-0141-1. eCollection 2017.
A prospective randomized multi-center study for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with the X STOP interspinous implant: 1-year results.
一项使用X STOP棘突间植入物治疗腰椎管狭窄症的前瞻性随机多中心研究:1年结果。
Eur Spine J. 2004 Feb;13(1):22-31. doi: 10.1007/s00586-003-0581-4. Epub 2003 Dec 19.
4
The effects of an interspinous implant on the kinematics of the instrumented and adjacent levels in the lumbar spine.棘突间植入物对腰椎植入节段及相邻节段运动学的影响。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Oct 1;28(19):2192-7. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000084877.88192.8E.
5
A radicular syndrome from developmental narrowing of the lumbar vertebral canal.腰椎管发育性狭窄所致的神经根综合征
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1954 May;36-B(2):230-7. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.36B2.230.
6
The effects of an interspinous implant on intervertebral disc pressures.棘突间植入物对椎间盘压力的影响。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Jan 1;28(1):26-32. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200301010-00008.
7
Adjacent-segment morbidity after Graf ligamentoplasty compared with posterolateral lumbar fusion.
J Neurosurg. 2001 Jul;95(1 Suppl):5-10. doi: 10.3171/spi.2001.95.1.0005.
8
Risk factors for adjacent-segment failure following lumbar fixation with rigid instrumentation for degenerative instability.退行性腰椎不稳症行坚强内固定术后邻近节段失败的危险因素。
J Neurosurg. 1999 Apr;90(2 Suppl):163-9. doi: 10.3171/spi.1999.90.2.0163.
9
The effect of spinal destabilization and instrumentation on lumbar intradiscal pressure: an in vitro biomechanical analysis.脊柱失稳与内固定对腰椎椎间盘内压力的影响:一项体外生物力学分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Nov 15;22(22):2655-63. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199711150-00014.
10
Lumbar motion segment pathology adjacent to thoracolumbar, lumbar, and lumbosacral fusions.胸腰段、腰椎及腰骶部融合术相邻节段的腰椎活动节段病变
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 Apr 15;21(8):970-81. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199604150-00013.