• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医院药房条形码解决方案的成本效益分析

Cost-benefit analysis of a hospital pharmacy bar code solution.

作者信息

Maviglia Saverio M, Yoo Jane Y, Franz Calvin, Featherstone Erica, Churchill William, Bates David W, Gandhi Tejal K, Poon Eric G

机构信息

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Wellesley, MA 02481, USA.

出版信息

Arch Intern Med. 2007 Apr 23;167(8):788-94. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.8.788.

DOI:10.1001/archinte.167.8.788
PMID:17452541
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bar coding can reduce hospital pharmacy dispensing errors, but it is unclear if the benefits of this technology justify its costs. The purpose of this study was to assess the costs and benefits and determine the return on investment at the institutional level for implementing a pharmacy bar code system.

METHODS

We performed a cost-benefit analysis of a bar code-assisted medication-dispensing system within a large, academic, nonprofit tertiary care hospital pharmacy. We took the implementing hospital's perspective for a 5-year horizon. The primary outcome was the net financial cost and benefit after 5 years. The secondary outcome was the time until total benefits equaled total costs. Single-variable, 2-variable, and multiple-variable Monte Carlo sensitivity analyses were performed to test the stability of the outcomes.

RESULTS

In inflation- and time value-adjusted 2005 dollars, total costs during 5 years were $2.24 million ($1.31 million in 1-time costs during the initial 3.5 years and $342 000 per year in recurring costs starting in year 3). The primary benefit was a decrease in adverse drug events from dispensing errors (517 events annually), resulting in an annual savings of $2.20 million. The net benefit after 5 years was $3.49 million. The break-even point for the hospital's investment occurred within 1 year after becoming fully operational. A net benefit was achieved within 10 years under almost all sensitivity scenarios. In the Monte Carlo simulation, the net benefit during 5 years was $3.2 million (95% confidence interval, -$1.2 million to $12.1 million), and the break-even point for return on investment occurred after 51 months (95% confidence interval, 30 to 180 months).

CONCLUSION

Implementation of a bar code-assisted medication-dispensing system in hospital pharmacies can result in a positive financial return on investment for the health care organization.

摘要

背景

条形码可减少医院药房配药错误,但该技术的益处是否能证明其成本合理尚不清楚。本研究的目的是评估成本和效益,并确定在机构层面实施药房条形码系统的投资回报率。

方法

我们对一家大型学术性非营利性三级护理医院药房内的条形码辅助配药系统进行了成本效益分析。我们从实施该系统的医院角度进行了为期5年的展望。主要结果是5年后的净财务成本和效益。次要结果是总效益等于总成本所需的时间。进行了单变量、双变量和多变量蒙特卡洛敏感性分析,以检验结果的稳定性。

结果

以2005年经通胀和时间价值调整后的美元计算,5年期间的总成本为224万美元(最初3.5年的一次性成本为131万美元,从第3年开始每年的经常性成本为34.2万美元)。主要益处是配药错误导致的药物不良事件减少(每年517起事件),每年节省220万美元。5年后的净效益为349万美元。医院投资的收支平衡点在全面投入运营后1年内实现。在几乎所有敏感性情景下,10年内都实现了净效益。在蒙特卡洛模拟中,5年期间的净效益为320万美元(95%置信区间,-120万美元至1210万美元),投资回报率的收支平衡点在51个月后出现(95%置信区间,30至180个月)。

结论

在医院药房实施条形码辅助配药系统可为医疗机构带来正的财务投资回报。

相似文献

1
Cost-benefit analysis of a hospital pharmacy bar code solution.医院药房条形码解决方案的成本效益分析
Arch Intern Med. 2007 Apr 23;167(8):788-94. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.8.788.
2
[Cost-benefit analysis of a semi-automated process in the preparation of unit-doses by the Pharmacy Department].[药房部门制备单剂量制剂半自动流程的成本效益分析]
Farm Hosp. 2004 Mar-Apr;28(2):76-83.
3
[Cost-benefit analysis of the implementation of automated drug-dispensing systems in Critical Care and Emergency Units].[重症监护和急诊科实施自动发药系统的成本效益分析]
Farm Hosp. 2003 Jan-Feb;27(1):4-11.
4
Use of bar codes in inpatient drug distribution.条形码在住院患者药品分发中的应用。
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1991 May;48(5):953-66.
5
Determining drug dispensing costs for use in cost-accounting systems.确定用于成本核算系统的药品配药成本。
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1988 Apr;45(4):844-7.
6
Cost analysis of a satellite pharmacy.卫星药房的成本分析
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1986 Aug;43(8):1927-30.
7
Justifying an information system.论证一个信息系统的合理性。
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1993 Mar;50(3):476-82.
8
Medication cart-filling time, accuracy, and cost with an automated dispensing system.自动配药系统的药车装填时间、准确性及成本
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1994 May 1;51(9):1193-6.
9
Bar-code technology for documenting administration of large-volume intravenous solutions.用于记录大容量静脉输液给药情况的条形码技术。
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1989 Feb;46(2):282-7.
10
Medication administration: the implementation process of bar-coding for medication administration to enhance medication safety.给药:用于给药的条形码实施过程,以提高用药安全性。
Nurs Econ. 2008 May-Jun;26(3):207-10.

引用本文的文献

1
Digital Health Technology Interventions for Improving Medication Safety: Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations.用于提高用药安全性的数字健康技术干预措施:经济评估的系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 5;27:e65546. doi: 10.2196/65546.
2
Assessment of the hospital pharmacy quality assurance system in selected hospitals in the Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚阿姆哈拉州部分医院医院药房质量保证体系评估
SAGE Open Med. 2024 Aug 27;12:20503121241272738. doi: 10.1177/20503121241272738. eCollection 2024.
3
Health information technology interventions and engagement in HIV care and achievement of viral suppression in publicly funded settings in the US: A cost-effectiveness analysis.
健康信息技术干预措施与艾滋病毒护理参与以及在美国公共资助环境中实现病毒抑制的成本效益分析。
PLoS Med. 2021 Apr 7;18(4):e1003389. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003389. eCollection 2021 Apr.
4
Interventions to reduce medication errors in anesthesia: a systematic review.减少麻醉中用药错误的干预措施:系统评价。
Can J Anaesth. 2021 Jun;68(6):880-893. doi: 10.1007/s12630-021-01959-7. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
5
Lessons Learned When Introducing Pharmacogenomic Panel Testing into Clinical Practice.将药物基因组学检测引入临床实践中的经验教训。
Value Health. 2017 Jan;20(1):54-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.08.727. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
6
Effect of the Implementation of Barcode Technology and an Electronic Medication Administration Record on Adverse Drug Events.条形码技术和电子给药记录的实施对药物不良事件的影响。
Hosp Pharm. 2016 Jun;51(6):474-83. doi: 10.1310/hpj5106-474.
7
Impact of interventions designed to reduce medication administration errors in hospitals: a systematic review.旨在减少医院用药错误的干预措施的影响:一项系统综述。
Drug Saf. 2014 May;37(5):317-32. doi: 10.1007/s40264-014-0152-0.
8
A qualitative study identifying the cost categories associated with electronic health record implementation in the UK.一项在英国确定与电子健康记录实施相关的成本类别的定性研究。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Oct;21(e2):e226-31. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002404. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
9
Towards improving dose administration aid supply: a quality improvement intervention aimed at reducing dispensing errors.为改善剂量给药辅助器具供应:旨在减少配药错误的质量改进干预措施。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2013 Dec;35(6):1152-60. doi: 10.1007/s11096-013-9839-z. Epub 2013 Aug 23.
10
Adverse drug events caused by serious medication administration errors.严重给药错误导致的药物不良事件。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Nov;21(11):933-8. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-000946. Epub 2012 Jul 12.