• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜经裂孔食管切除术:手术结果

Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy: outcomes.

作者信息

Tinoco Renam, El-Kadre Luciana, Tinoco Augusto, Rios Rodrigo, Sueth Daniela, Pena Felipe

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Hospital São José do Avaí, Itaperuna, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2007 Aug;21(8):1284-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9267-z. Epub 2007 Apr 24.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-007-9267-z
PMID:17453288
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy, indicated for benign and malignant esophageal diseases, is a complex operation, often associated with a high rate of morbidity and mortality. During the past decade this technique has became well accepted among specialized surgeons for the treatment of esophageal cancer, avoiding thoracotomy and reducing open access complications. The aim of the present study was to retrospectively analyze patients with esophageal cancer who underwent laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy.

METHODS

From November 1993 to August 2006, 78 patients underwent laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy. There were 68 cases of esophageal cancer (57 males and 21 females, age range = 28-73 years) with a predominant rate of squamous cell carcinoma (60.2%).

RESULTS

The conversion rate was 6.4%. The mean operative time was 153 min with a 12.8% rate of cervical leak and a postoperative (30-day) mortality rate of 5.1%. The four-year survival rate was 19% as determined within a subgroup of 21 patients whose followup during the period was possible.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy is a safe alternative for experienced professionals. This access can improve mortality, hospital stay, and other outcomes when compared with open methods.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜经裂孔食管切除术适用于良性和恶性食管疾病,是一项复杂的手术,常伴有较高的发病率和死亡率。在过去十年中,这项技术已被专业外科医生广泛接受用于治疗食管癌,避免了开胸手术并减少了开放手术相关并发症。本研究的目的是回顾性分析接受腹腔镜经裂孔食管切除术的食管癌患者。

方法

1993年11月至2006年8月,78例患者接受了腹腔镜经裂孔食管切除术。其中68例为食管癌患者(男性57例,女性21例,年龄范围28 - 73岁),鳞状细胞癌占主导比例(60.2%)。

结果

中转开腹率为6.4%。平均手术时间为153分钟,颈部吻合口漏发生率为12.8%,术后(30天)死亡率为5.1%。在21例在此期间能够进行随访的患者亚组中,四年生存率为19%。

结论

腹腔镜经裂孔食管切除术对于有经验的专业人员来说是一种安全的选择。与开放手术方法相比,这种手术途径可改善死亡率、住院时间及其他预后。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy: outcomes.腹腔镜经裂孔食管切除术:手术结果
Surg Endosc. 2007 Aug;21(8):1284-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9267-z. Epub 2007 Apr 24.
2
[Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy: outcomes].[腹腔镜经裂孔食管切除术:手术结果]
Arq Gastroenterol. 2007 Apr-Jun;44(2):141-4. doi: 10.1590/s0004-28032007000200011.
3
Laparoscopic versus open transhiatal esophagectomy for distal and junction cancer.腹腔镜与开放经食管裂孔食管癌切除术治疗远端和交界部癌症。
Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2012 Apr;104(4):197-202. doi: 10.4321/s1130-01082012000400005.
4
Robot-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy: a 3-year single-center experience.机器人辅助经食管裂孔食管切除术:3 年单中心经验。
Dis Esophagus. 2013 Feb-Mar;26(2):159-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2012.01325.x. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
5
Assisted laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy for the treatment of esophageal cancer.辅助腹腔镜经裂孔食管癌切除术治疗食管癌
Clin Transl Oncol. 2006 Mar;8(3):185-92. doi: 10.1007/s12094-006-0009-9.
6
An audit of surgical outcomes of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.食管鳞状细胞癌手术结果的审计
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007 Mar;31(3):536-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.12.002. Epub 2007 Jan 11.
7
Laparoscopic versus open transhiatal oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer.腹腔镜与开放经裂孔食管癌切除术治疗食管癌的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 31;3(3):CD011390. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011390.pub2.
8
Laparoscopic transhiatal surgery of the esophagus.腹腔镜经裂孔食管手术
JSLS. 2005 Oct-Dec;9(4):376-81.
9
Perioperative outcomes of single-port mediastinoscope-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer.单孔纵隔镜辅助经裂孔食管癌切除术治疗胸段食管癌的围手术期结果
Dis Esophagus. 2017 Oct 1;30(10):1-8. doi: 10.1093/dote/dox047.
10
Pros and cons of the gasless laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy for upper esophageal carcinoma.非气腹腹腔镜经裂孔食管癌切除术治疗上段食管癌的利弊
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jun;30(6):2382-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4488-z. Epub 2015 Sep 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Minimally invasive oesophagectomy: current status and future direction.微创食管切除术:现状与未来方向。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Jul;25(7):2071-83. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1511-2. Epub 2011 Feb 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Esophageal cancer.食管癌
N Engl J Med. 2003 Dec 4;349(23):2241-52. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra035010.
2
Esophagectomy and laparoscopic gastric mobilization with minilaparotomy for tubulization and esophageal replacement.食管切除术及经小切口腹腔镜游离胃用于管状化和食管置换术。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2001 Apr;11(2):119-25.
3
Thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy.胸腔镜和腹腔镜食管切除术
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000 Jul;12(3):195-200. doi: 10.1053/stcs.2000.9599.
4
The role of multimodality therapy for resectable esophageal cancer.多模态疗法在可切除食管癌治疗中的作用。
Am J Surg. 2000 Jun;179(6):508-13. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(00)00384-6.
5
Advances in minimally invasive esophageal surgery.微创食管手术的进展
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 1999 Jun;1(3):203-9. doi: 10.1007/s11894-999-0035-1.
6
Minimally invasive surgical staging for esophageal cancer.食管癌的微创外科分期
Surg Endosc. 2000 Aug;14(8):700-2. doi: 10.1007/s004640000222.
7
The recurrence pattern of esophageal carcinoma after transhiatal resection.经裂孔食管切除术治疗食管癌后的复发模式
J Am Coll Surg. 2000 Aug;191(2):143-8. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(00)00349-5.
8
Comparison of minimally invasive esophagectomy with transthoracic and transhiatal esophagectomy.微创食管切除术与经胸及经裂孔食管切除术的比较。
Arch Surg. 2000 Aug;135(8):920-5. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.135.8.920.
9
Improvement in the results of surgical treatment of advanced squamous esophageal carcinoma during 15 consecutive years.连续15年期间晚期食管鳞癌外科治疗结果的改善。
Ann Surg. 2000 Aug;232(2):225-32. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200008000-00013.
10
Adenocarcinoma of the esophagus with and without Barrett mucosa.伴有和不伴有巴雷特黏膜的食管腺癌。
Arch Surg. 2000 Jul;135(7):831-5; discussion 836. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.135.7.831.