Suppr超能文献

微创食管切除术:现状与未来方向。

Minimally invasive oesophagectomy: current status and future direction.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Ipswich Hospital, Chelmsford Avenue, Ipswich, QLD, Australia.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2011 Jul;25(7):2071-83. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1511-2. Epub 2011 Feb 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Oesophagectomy is one of the most challenging surgeries. Potential for morbidity and mortality is high. Minimally invasive techniques have been introduced in an attempt to reduce postoperative complications and recovery times. Debate continues over whether these techniques are beneficial to morbidity and whether oncological resection is compromised. This review article will analyse the different techniques employed in minimally invasive oesophagectomy (MIO) and critically evaluate commonly reported outcome measures from the available literature.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, Science Citation Index, Current Contents, and PubMed databases were used to search English language articles published on MIO. Thirty-one articles underwent thorough analysis and the data were tabulated where appropriate. To date, only level III evidence exists. Where appropriate, comparisons are made with a meta-analysis on open oesophagectomy.

RESULTS

Positive aspects of MIO include at least comparable postoperative recovery data and oncological resection measures to open surgery. Intensive care unit requirements are lower, as is duration of inpatient stay. Respiratory morbidity varies. Negative aspects include increased technical skill of the surgeon and increased equipment requirements, increased operative time and limitation with respect to local advancement of cancer. With increasing individual experience, improvements in outcome measures and the amenability of this approach to increasing neoplastic advancement has been shown.

CONCLUSION

MIO has outcome measures at least as comparable to open oesophagectomy in the setting of benign and nonlocally advanced cancer. Transthoracic oesophagectomy provides superior exposure to the thoracic oesophagus compared to the transhiatal approach and is currently preferred. No multicentre randomised controlled trials exist or are likely to come into fruition. As with all surgery, careful patient selection is required for optimal results from MIO.

摘要

背景

食管切除术是最具挑战性的手术之一。发病率和死亡率的潜在风险很高。微创技术已经被引入,试图减少术后并发症和恢复时间。关于这些技术是否有利于降低发病率以及是否会影响肿瘤切除范围的争论仍在继续。本文将分析微创食管切除术(MIO)中采用的不同技术,并批判性地评估现有文献中常见的报告结果指标。

方法

使用 Medline、Embase、Science Citation Index、Current Contents 和 PubMed 数据库搜索发表在 MIO 上的英文文章。对 31 篇文章进行了深入分析,并在适当的情况下对数据进行了制表。迄今为止,只有 III 级证据存在。在适当的情况下,与开放性食管切除术的荟萃分析进行了比较。

结果

MIO 的积极方面包括至少与开放性手术相当的术后恢复数据和肿瘤切除措施。重症监护病房的需求较低,住院时间也较短。呼吸并发症有所不同。消极方面包括外科医生的技术技能要求更高、设备要求更高、手术时间延长以及对癌症局部进展的限制。随着个人经验的增加,在改善结果指标方面以及这种方法对增加肿瘤进展的适用性方面已经取得了进展。

结论

在良性和非局部晚期癌症的情况下,MIO 的结果指标至少与开放性食管切除术相当。经胸食管切除术与经食管裂孔入路相比,提供了对胸段食管更好的显露,目前是首选方法。目前没有多中心随机对照试验,也不太可能出现。与所有手术一样,MIO 需要对患者进行精心选择,以获得最佳结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验