• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大肠自我报告内镜检查的有效性及其对结直肠癌风险评估的影响。

Validity of self-reported endoscopies of the large bowel and implications for estimates of colorectal cancer risk.

作者信息

Hoffmeister Michael, Chang-Claude Jenny, Brenner Hermann

机构信息

Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Am J Epidemiol. 2007 Jul 15;166(2):130-6. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm062. Epub 2007 Apr 23.

DOI:10.1093/aje/kwm062
PMID:17456475
Abstract

Large-bowel endoscopy with removal of polyps strongly reduces colorectal cancer risk. In epidemiologic studies, ascertainment of large-bowel endoscopies often relies on self-reports and might be prone to imperfect recall. In 2003-2004, the authors assessed the validity of self-reported colorectal endoscopies in a population-based case-control study including 540 cases and 614 controls from southwest Germany and calculated odds ratios of colorectal cancer risk according to self-reports and medical records. They sought to obtain all medical records for the last self-reported endoscopy and for a subsample of 100 subjects reporting no previous endoscopy. In total, 377 of 483 records could be obtained (78%). Sensitivity of self-reports was 100%, and specificity ranged from 93% to 98% among subgroups defined by age, gender, education, family history of colorectal cancer, and case-control status. The odds ratios for colorectal cancer risk after previous colonoscopy were 0.31 (95% confidence interval: 0.21, 0.45) using self-reports and 0.31 (95% confidence interval: 0.20, 0.47) using medical records. However, agreement between self-reports and medical records was poor regarding type of endoscopy (colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, or rectoscopy; kappa = 0.22), moderate concerning polypectomy (kappa = 0.58), and reasonable for year of examination (kappa = 0.70). Self-reports of previous colorectal endoscopies agreed well with medical records, but validation appears to be essential with respect to details of the examination.

摘要

通过切除息肉进行的大肠内镜检查可显著降低结直肠癌风险。在流行病学研究中,大肠内镜检查的确定往往依赖于自我报告,可能容易出现回忆不完整的情况。2003年至2004年,作者在一项基于人群的病例对照研究中评估了自我报告的大肠内镜检查的有效性,该研究包括来自德国西南部的540例病例和614例对照,并根据自我报告和医疗记录计算了结直肠癌风险的比值比。他们试图获取上次自我报告的内镜检查的所有医疗记录,以及100名报告未曾进行过内镜检查的受试者的子样本记录。总共获得了483份记录中的377份(78%)。自我报告的敏感性为100%,在按年龄、性别、教育程度、结直肠癌家族史和病例对照状态定义的亚组中,特异性范围为93%至98%。使用自我报告时,先前结肠镜检查后结直肠癌风险的比值比为0.31(95%置信区间:0.21,0.45),使用医疗记录时为0.31(95%置信区间:0.20,0.47)。然而,在结肠镜检查类型(结肠镜检查、乙状结肠镜检查或直肠镜检查;kappa = 0.22)方面,自我报告与医疗记录之间的一致性较差,在息肉切除术方面为中等(kappa = 0.58),在检查年份方面较为合理(kappa = 0.70)。先前大肠内镜检查的自我报告与医疗记录吻合良好,但就检查细节而言,验证似乎至关重要。

相似文献

1
Validity of self-reported endoscopies of the large bowel and implications for estimates of colorectal cancer risk.大肠自我报告内镜检查的有效性及其对结直肠癌风险评估的影响。
Am J Epidemiol. 2007 Jul 15;166(2):130-6. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm062. Epub 2007 Apr 23.
2
Validation of self-reported history of colorectal cancer screening.自我报告的结直肠癌筛查病史的验证。
Can Fam Physician. 2007 Jul;53(7):1192-7.
3
Case-control study supports extension of surveillance interval after colonoscopic polypectomy to at least 5 yr.病例对照研究支持将结肠镜息肉切除术后的监测间隔延长至至少5年。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Aug;102(8):1739-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01231.x. Epub 2007 Apr 13.
4
Validity of self-reported colorectal cancer screening behavior.自我报告的结直肠癌筛查行为的有效性。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2000 Feb;9(2):229-32.
5
Validation of self-reported colorectal cancer screening behavior from a mixed-mode survey of veterans.对退伍军人混合模式调查中自我报告的结直肠癌筛查行为的验证。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 Apr;17(4):768-76. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-0759. Epub 2008 Apr 1.
6
Validity of four self-reported colorectal cancer screening modalities in a general population: differences over time and by intervention assignment.一般人群中四种自我报告的结直肠癌筛查方式的有效性:随时间变化及干预分配的差异
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 Apr;17(4):777-84. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-0441. Epub 2008 Apr 1.
7
Validation of self-reported colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in a study of ethnically diverse first-degree relatives of CRC cases.在一项针对结直肠癌(CRC)病例的不同种族一级亲属的研究中,对自我报告的结直肠癌筛查进行验证。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 Apr;17(4):791-8. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2625. Epub 2008 Apr 1.
8
A population-based, community estimate of total colon examination: the impact on compliance with screening for colorectal cancer.基于人群的全结肠检查社区评估:对结直肠癌筛查依从性的影响
Am J Gastroenterol. 2002 Feb;97(2):446-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05484.x.
9
Data sources for measuring colorectal endoscopy use among Medicare enrollees.衡量医疗保险参保者结直肠内镜检查使用情况的数据来源。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007 Oct;16(10):2118-27. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-0123.
10
Accuracy of colorectal polyp self-reports: findings from the colon cancer family registry.结直肠息肉自我报告的准确性:来自结肠癌家族登记处的发现
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007 Sep;16(9):1898-901. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-0151. Epub 2007 Aug 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Intended and Actual Participation in the Colorectal Cancer Screening Program.结直肠癌筛查项目的预期参与情况与实际参与情况。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2024 Jul 26;121(15):497-504. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2024.0087.
2
Socioeconomic inequality in organized and opportunistic screening for gastric cancer: results from the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey 2009-2022.社会经济不平等对胃癌有组织和机会性筛查的影响:来自 2009-2022 年韩国国家癌症筛查调查的结果。
Front Public Health. 2023 Oct 9;11:1256525. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1256525. eCollection 2023.
3
Socioeconomic inequality in organized and opportunistic screening for colorectal cancer: results from the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey, 2009-2021.
社会经济不平等与结直肠癌的有组织和机会性筛查:来自 2009-2021 年韩国国家癌症筛查调查的结果。
Epidemiol Health. 2023;45:e2023086. doi: 10.4178/epih.e2023086. Epub 2023 Sep 17.
4
10-year prevalence of diagnostic and screening colonoscopy use in Germany: a claims data analysis.德国诊断性和筛查性结肠镜使用的 10 年流行率:一项索赔数据分析。
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2022 Nov 1;31(6):497-504. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000736. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
5
Colorectal Cancer Risk by Genetic Variants in Populations With and Without Colonoscopy History.有和无结肠镜检查史人群中遗传变异与结直肠癌风险的关系。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2021 Jan 23;5(1). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkab008. eCollection 2021 Feb.
6
Self-Reported Lower Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Use and Changes in Colorectal Cancer Mortality Rates in European Countries.欧洲国家自报的下消化道内镜使用情况及结直肠癌死亡率变化。
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2020 Oct;11(10):e00243. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000243.
7
Estimation of Absolute Risk of Colorectal Cancer Based on Healthy Lifestyle, Genetic Risk, and Colonoscopy Status in a Population-Based Study.基于人群研究中健康生活方式、遗传风险和结肠镜检查状况对结直肠癌绝对风险的评估。
Gastroenterology. 2020 Jul;159(1):129-138.e9. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.03.016. Epub 2020 Mar 14.
8
Five-Year Overall Survival of Interval Breast Cancers is Better than Non- Interval Cancers from Korean Breast Cancer Registry.韩国乳腺癌登记处数据显示,间期性乳腺癌的五年总生存率高于非间期性乳腺癌。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019 Jun 1;20(6):1717-1726. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.6.1717.
9
Socioeconomic Inequalities in Colorectal Cancer Screening in Korea, 2005-2015: After the Introduction of the National Cancer Screening Program.2005 - 2015年韩国结直肠癌筛查中的社会经济不平等:国家癌症筛查计划实施之后
Yonsei Med J. 2018 Nov;59(9):1034-1040. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2018.59.9.1034.
10
Strongly enhanced colorectal cancer risk stratification by combining family history and genetic risk score.通过结合家族史和遗传风险评分显著增强结直肠癌风险分层
Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Jan 19;10:143-152. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S145636. eCollection 2018.