Heumann Silke G
University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam School for Social Science Research (ASSR), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Cult Health Sex. 2007 May-Jun;9(3):217-31. doi: 10.1080/13691050600859062.
This paper analyses discussion on a proposed reform to the abortion law in Nicaragua between 1999 and 2002, as a struggle between different actors - politicians, religious leaders, doctors and feminists - over the meaning of abortion, motherhood and sexuality, and ultimately the value of women's lives. It shows how the interplay of gender discourses and political practices shaped the process of discussion: on one hand by making a broad alliance against abortion possible, on the other by highlighting the contradictory role of the women's movement in this discussion, between a dominant leadership and a low mobilizing capacity. The paper argues for the need of an inwards oriented process within the women's movement, that departs from the recognition of the personal issues at stake for women in order to break the silence surrounding abortion, such as prevailing feelings of fear and guilt. This entails recognition of the limits of the liberal feminist claim to 'abortion as a free choice', as a discourse of rights that is disconnected from the everyday life conditions and constraints under which women make choices and develop their notions of rights.
本文分析了1999年至2002年尼加拉瓜关于堕胎法改革提议的讨论,这是一场不同行为体——政治家、宗教领袖、医生和女权主义者——围绕堕胎、母性和性取向的意义,以及最终女性生命价值展开的斗争。它展示了性别话语与政治实践的相互作用如何塑造了讨论过程:一方面,它使广泛的反堕胎联盟成为可能;另一方面,它凸显了妇女运动在这场讨论中的矛盾角色,即领导层占主导地位但动员能力较低。本文主张妇女运动需要一个内向型的进程,该进程始于认识到妇女所面临的个人利害问题,以打破围绕堕胎的沉默,比如普遍存在的恐惧和内疚感。这需要认识到自由女权主义者“堕胎是自由选择”这一主张的局限性,因为这一权利话语与妇女做出选择并形成其权利观念时所处的日常生活条件和限制脱节。