Knight Carrie S, Crum Mary A, Hardy Robert W
Department of Pathology, Division of Laboratory Medicine, P230 West Pavilion, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 619 South 19th St., Birmingham, AL 35233, USA.
Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2007 Jun;14(6):710-3. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00068-07. Epub 2007 Apr 25.
We report the results of an evaluation of the LIAISON Treponema pallidum-specific assay, a one-step sandwich chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA), as a screening test and as a confirmatory test for the diagnosis of syphilis. The assay was compared with the CAPTIA Syphilis-G enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and with a testing algorithm that also included the rapid plasma reagin (RPR) and T. pallidum particle agglutination (PA) assays. As a screening test, the CLIA showed levels of agreement with the EIA and with the algorithm, respectively, of 94.1 and 100% for 51 samples from patients with primary or secondary syphilis, 93.2 and 98.7% for 999 samples sent to the laboratory for routine syphilis testing, 84.5 and 94.0% for 200 samples from human immunodeficiency virus-positive patients, 98.0 and 100% for 200 samples from pregnant patients, and 94.3 and 98.3% for 992 samples from apparently healthy adults. As a confirmatory test, the CLIA showed 99% agreement with the EIA for 204 RPR-positive samples. After resolution with further T. pallidum PA testing and the discarding of one sample of insufficient quantity, there was 100% agreement for the remaining 203 samples. For the total group of 2,645 samples, the overall relative sensitivity was 95.8% and the relative specificity was 99.1%. We conclude that the LIAISON CLIA demonstrated excellent sensitivity and specificity when evaluated as a confirmatory test and as a screening test for syphilis among various patient populations, including specific populations with reportedly increased rates of false-positive nontreponemal test results.
我们报告了对LIAISON梅毒螺旋体特异性检测法(一种一步夹心化学发光免疫分析法,CLIA)作为梅毒诊断的筛查试验和确证试验的评估结果。该检测法与CAPTIA梅毒-G酶免疫分析法(EIA)以及一种检测算法进行了比较,该算法还包括快速血浆反应素(RPR)和梅毒螺旋体颗粒凝集(PA)试验。作为筛查试验,对于来自一期或二期梅毒患者的51份样本,CLIA与EIA以及该算法的符合率分别为94.1%和100%;对于送至实验室进行常规梅毒检测的999份样本,符合率分别为93.2%和98.7%;对于来自人类免疫缺陷病毒阳性患者的200份样本,符合率分别为84.5%和94.0%;对于来自孕妇的200份样本,符合率分别为98.0%和100%;对于来自看似健康成年人的992份样本,符合率分别为94.3%和98.3%。作为确证试验,对于204份RPR阳性样本,CLIA与EIA的符合率为99%。在通过进一步的梅毒螺旋体PA检测解决问题并丢弃一份量不足的样本后,其余203份样本的符合率为100%。对于总共2645份样本,总体相对灵敏度为95.8%,相对特异性为99.1%。我们得出结论,在对包括据报道非梅毒螺旋体试验假阳性率增加的特定人群在内的各种患者群体进行梅毒确证试验和筛查试验评估时,LIAISON CLIA显示出优异的灵敏度和特异性。