De Smet Rita, Dhondt Annemieke, Eloot Sunny, Galli Francesco, Waterloos Marie Anne, Vanholder Raymond
Renal Division, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Ghent, Gent, Belgium.
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007 Jul;22(7):2006-12. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfm065. Epub 2007 Apr 27.
Uraemic solutes accumulate in haemodialysis (HD) patients and interfere with physiological functions. Low-flux (LF) HD does not efficiently remove all uraemic compounds. We investigated whether large pore super-flux (SF) cellulose triacetate membranes (CTA) result in a better removal of uraemic solutes.
Eleven patients were dialysed consecutively with LF-CTA and SF-CTA during 3 weeks. Urea (UR), creatinine (CR), uric acid (UA), 3-carboxy-4-methyl-5-propyl-2-furanpropionic acid (CMPF), indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), indoxyl sulfate (IS), hippuric acid (HA), pentosidine (PENT), low-molecular weight (MW) AGEs (AGEs) and albumin were determined in pre-HD, post-HD blood and in dialysate. Reduction rate (RR), dialytic clearance and mass transfer-area coefficient (KoA) were calculated.
SF-HD resulted in a higher RR than LF-HD for IS and AGEs. Urea RR correlated with HA (r=0.59), IS (r=0.68) and IAA (r=0.67), (P<0.05) for SF. Dialytic clearance ranged from 20+/-5 to 179+/-20 ml/min for LF and from 24+/-6 to 191+/-24 ml/min for SF; being higher with SF for UA, HA, IS and IAA (SF vs LF, P<0.05). KoA was higher for most compounds with SF-HD. Albumin loss per SF session was 3.4+/-1.3 g. The retrieved amount of uraemic solutes in dialysate with LF and SF was comparable.
In conventional HD, SF-CTA was superior to LF-CTA for removal of most protein-bound compounds, especially IS. Reduction rate, dialytic clearance and KoA were higher with SF. The SF-CTA membrane is albumin-leaking; however, this property could not completely explain the amount of retrieved protein-bound compounds in dialysate.
尿毒症溶质在血液透析(HD)患者体内蓄积并干扰生理功能。低通量(LF)血液透析不能有效清除所有尿毒症化合物。我们研究了大孔超通量(SF)三醋酸纤维素膜(CTA)是否能更好地清除尿毒症溶质。
11例患者在3周内先后使用LF-CTA和SF-CTA进行透析。分别测定透析前、透析后血液及透析液中的尿素(UR)、肌酐(CR)、尿酸(UA)、3-羧基-4-甲基-5-丙基-2-呋喃丙酸(CMPF)、吲哚-3-乙酸(IAA)、硫酸吲哚酚(IS)、马尿酸(HA)、戊糖苷(PENT)、低分子量(MW)晚期糖基化终产物(AGEs)和白蛋白。计算清除率(RR)、透析清除率和传质面积系数(KoA)。
SF-HD对IS和AGEs的RR高于LF-HD。对于SF,尿素RR与HA(r = 0.59)、IS(r = 0.68)和IAA(r = 0.67)相关,(P < 0.05)。LF的透析清除率范围为20±5至179±20 ml/min,SF为24±6至191±24 ml/min;SF对UA、HA、IS和IAA的透析清除率更高(SF与LF相比,P < 0.05)。SF-HD时大多数化合物的KoA更高。每次SF透析白蛋白丢失量为3.4±1.3 g。LF和SF透析液中尿毒症溶质的回收量相当。
在常规血液透析中,SF-CTA在清除大多数与蛋白结合的化合物,尤其是IS方面优于LF-CTA。SF的清除率、透析清除率和KoA更高。SF-CTA膜会导致白蛋白渗漏;然而,这一特性不能完全解释透析液中回收的与蛋白结合化合物的量。