Mohr Sylvia, Gillieron Christiane, Borras Laurence, Brandt Pierre-Yves, Huguelet Philippe
Division of Adult Psychiatry, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2007 Mar;195(3):247-53. doi: 10.1097/01.nmd.0000258230.94304.6b.
To assess religious coping in schizophrenia, we developed and tested a clinical grid, as no validated questionnaire exists for this population. One hundred fifteen outpatients were interviewed. Results obtained by 2 clinicians were compared. Religion was central in the lives of 45% of patients, 60% used religion extensively to cope with their illness. Religion is a multifaceted construct. Principal component analysis elicited 4 factors: subjective dimension, collective dimension, synergy with psychiatric treatment, and ease of talking about religion with psychiatrist. Different associations were found between these factors and psychopathology, substance abuse, and psychosocial adaptation. The high prevalence of spirituality and religious coping clearly indicates the necessity of addressing spirituality in patient care. Our clinical grid is suitable for this purpose. It proved its applicability to a broad diversity of religious beliefs, even pathological ones. Interjudge reliability and construct validity were high and specific training is not required.
为评估精神分裂症患者的宗教应对方式,我们开发并测试了一个临床量表,因为目前尚无针对该人群的有效问卷。我们对115名门诊患者进行了访谈,并比较了两名临床医生所得的结果。宗教在45%的患者生活中占据核心地位,60%的患者广泛运用宗教来应对疾病。宗教是一个多维度的概念。主成分分析得出了4个因素:主观维度、集体维度、与精神科治疗的协同作用以及与精神科医生谈论宗教的难易程度。在这些因素与精神病理学、药物滥用及社会心理适应之间发现了不同的关联。精神性和宗教应对方式的高患病率清楚地表明在患者护理中关注精神性的必要性。我们的临床量表适用于此目的。它已证明适用于广泛多样的宗教信仰,甚至是病态的宗教信仰。评判者间信度和结构效度都很高,且无需特殊培训。