Hustad Katherine C, Dardis Caitlin M, McCourt Kelly A
Department of Communicative Disorders & Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, WI, USA.
Clin Linguist Phon. 2007 May;21(5):353-67. doi: 10.1080/02699200701259150.
This study examined the independent and interactive effects of visual information and linguistic class of words on intelligibility of dysarthric speech. Seven speakers with dysarthria participated in the study, along with 224 listeners who transcribed speech samples in audiovisual (AV) or audio-only (AO) listening conditions. Orthographic transcriptions from listeners were scored for the number of words identified correctly. Correctly identified words were then coded into two linguistic classes, open and closed. Results showed that across all speakers and listeners, the AV presentation mode resulted in significantly higher intelligibility scores than the AO mode. However, the difference was significant for only three of seven individual speakers. Results also showed that across all speakers and listeners, closed class words were more intelligible than open class words. The difference between linguistic classes was significant for six of seven individual speakers. The interaction between linguistic class and mode of presentation was not significant, indicating that the margin of benefit for closed class words was consistent across presentation modalities.
本研究考察了视觉信息和词汇的语言类别对构音障碍语音可懂度的独立影响和交互作用。七名构音障碍患者参与了这项研究,同时还有224名听众,他们在视听(AV)或仅音频(AO)的聆听条件下转录语音样本。对听众的正字法转录进行正确识别单词数量的评分。然后将正确识别的单词编码为两个语言类别,开放类和封闭类。结果表明,在所有说话者和听众中,AV呈现模式的可懂度得分显著高于AO模式。然而,这种差异仅在七名个体说话者中的三名中具有显著性。结果还表明,在所有说话者和听众中,封闭类单词比开放类单词更易懂。语言类别之间的差异在七名个体说话者中的六名中具有显著性。语言类别和呈现模式之间的交互作用不显著,表明封闭类单词的受益幅度在不同呈现方式下是一致的。