• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过检索策略减少听觉干扰。

Reduction in auditory distraction by retrieval strategy.

作者信息

Perham Nick, Banbury Simon P, Jones Dylan M

机构信息

Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.

出版信息

Memory. 2007 May;15(4):465-73. doi: 10.1080/09658210701288244.

DOI:10.1080/09658210701288244
PMID:17469024
Abstract

Most research on auditory distraction on task performance focuses on those features of the sound that determine a drop in efficiency, with scant regard for examining the processing properties inherent in the focal task. We report how one such property, retrieval strategy, can also influence the degree of disruption by background sound. Using a task that called for the retrieval of realistic train journey information, we showed that retrieval by categories of verbal sequences was not susceptible to disruption by office sound - 65-75 dB(A). However, versions of the task requiring either free or serial recall showed evidence of disruption, a pattern of results consistent with the changing-state account of the irrelevant sound effect, which highlights the key role of serial rehearsal in determining disruption.

摘要

大多数关于听觉干扰对任务表现影响的研究都聚焦于声音的那些决定效率下降的特征,而很少关注检查核心任务中固有的处理特性。我们报告了这样一种特性——检索策略——如何也能影响背景声音造成干扰的程度。通过一项要求检索真实火车旅程信息的任务,我们发现按言语序列类别进行检索不易受到65 - 75分贝(A)的办公室声音干扰。然而,该任务的自由回忆或系列回忆版本显示出干扰的迹象,这一结果模式与无关声音效应的变化状态解释一致,该解释强调了系列复述在确定干扰方面的关键作用。

相似文献

1
Reduction in auditory distraction by retrieval strategy.通过检索策略减少听觉干扰。
Memory. 2007 May;15(4):465-73. doi: 10.1080/09658210701288244.
2
Cross-modal distraction by background speech: what role for meaning?背景语音的跨模态干扰:意义起什么作用?
Noise Health. 2010 Oct-Dec;12(49):210-6. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.70499.
3
Speech versus non-speech as irrelevant sound: controlling acoustic variation.言语与非言语无关声音:控制声学变化。
Biol Psychol. 2010 Sep;85(1):62-70. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.05.004. Epub 2010 May 27.
4
Auditory memory and the irrelevant sound effect: Further evidence for changing-state disruption.听觉记忆与无关声音效应:状态变化干扰的进一步证据。
Memory. 2002 May;10(3):199-214. doi: 10.1080/09658210143000335.
5
Hemispheric asymmetries in auditory distraction.听觉分散的半球不对称性。
Brain Cogn. 2010 Nov;74(2):79-87. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2010.06.007. Epub 2010 Aug 4.
6
Irrelevant sound disrupts order information in free recall as in serial recall.无关声音会像在系列回忆中那样干扰自由回忆中的顺序信息。
Q J Exp Psychol A. 1998 Aug;51(3):615-36. doi: 10.1080/713755774.
7
The role of rehearsal in a novel call center-type task.复述在新型呼叫中心式任务中的作用。
Noise Health. 2012 Jan-Feb;14(56):1-5. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.93308.
8
Disruption of short-term memory by changing and deviant sounds: support for a duplex-mechanism account of auditory distraction.通过变化和异常声音破坏短期记忆:支持听觉分心的双重机制解释。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Nov;33(6):1050-61. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.6.1050.
9
Auditory distraction and serial memory: the avoidable and the ineluctable.听觉干扰与系列记忆:可避免的与不可避免的
Noise Health. 2010 Oct-Dec;12(49):201-9. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.70497.
10
Interference by process, not content, determines semantic auditory distraction.过程而非内容的干扰决定了语义听觉分心。
Cognition. 2009 Jan;110(1):23-38. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.08.003. Epub 2008 Dec 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Task-specific auditory distraction in serial recall and mental arithmetic.任务特异性听觉分心对系列回忆和心算的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2023 May;51(4):930-951. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01363-6. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
2
Decomposing the role of rehearsal in auditory distraction during serial recall.剖析系列回忆过程中复述在听觉分心方面所起的作用。
Audit Percept Cogn. 2020;3(1-2):18-32. doi: 10.1080/25742442.2020.1842996. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
3
Objective measures of cognitive performance in activity based workplaces and traditional office types.
基于活动的工作场所和传统办公室类型中认知表现的客观测量。
J Environ Psychol. 2020 Dec;72:101503. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101503. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
4
On interpretation and task selection: the sub-component hypothesis of cognitive noise effects.关于解释与任务选择:认知噪声效应的子成分假说
Front Psychol. 2015 Jan 15;5:1598. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01598. eCollection 2014.
5
High working memory capacity attenuates the deviation effect but not the changing-state effect: further support for the duplex-mechanism account of auditory distraction.高工作记忆容量会减弱偏差效应,但不会减弱状态变化效应:对听觉分心的双重机制理论的进一步支持。
Mem Cognit. 2010 Jul;38(5):651-8. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.5.651.