Suppr超能文献

对处于危险中的青少年使用大麻的预测因素进行关联间接评估的比较。

Comparison of indirect assessments of association as predictors of marijuana use among at-risk adolescents.

作者信息

Ames Susan L, Grenard Jerry L, Thush Carolien, Sussman Steve, Wiers Reinout W, Stacy Alan W

机构信息

Institute for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Research, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 91803, USA.

出版信息

Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2007 Apr;15(2):204-18. doi: 10.1037/1064-1297.15.2.218.

Abstract

In this study, the authors compared indirect measures that attempt to quantify the level of marijuana associations among adolescents. They also evaluated whether these various methods overlap or tap different aspects of associative processes that may act in concert to influence marijuana use. Automatic drug-relevant associations were assessed in 121 at-risk youth in continuation high schools in California with the use of a word association index and computer-based, reaction time measures (i.e., Implicit Association Test [IAT] and Extrinsic Affective Simon Task [EAST]). Measures of working memory capacity, sensation seeking, and explicit cognitions also were included in analyses as potential confounders. The word association index and the marijuana IAT excited D measure were significant predictors of marijuana use. The word association index accounted for more variance in marijuana use than did the IAT or EAST measures. Further, confirmatory factor analytic models of the indirect measures of marijuana use revealed a significant moderate correlation between the EAST Excitement and Word Association factors but no significant correlations between the Word Association and IAT factors. These findings suggest that there is some convergence among the different indirect measures, but these assessments also appear to tap different aspects of associative processes. The types of indirect measures evaluated in this work provide information about spontaneous cognitions related to substance use, capturing influences on behavior that are not evaluated with traditional explicit assessments of behavior. Findings from this work add to a growing body of research that implicates the importance of implicit associative processes in risk and health behaviors.

摘要

在本研究中,作者比较了旨在量化青少年中大麻关联程度的间接测量方法。他们还评估了这些不同方法是否重叠,或者是否挖掘了可能共同作用以影响大麻使用的关联过程的不同方面。利用一个词语联想指数和基于计算机的反应时间测量方法(即内隐联想测验[IAT]和外在情感西蒙任务[EAST]),对加利福尼亚州继续教育高中的121名高危青少年的自动药物相关联想进行了评估。工作记忆容量、感觉寻求和外显认知的测量也作为潜在混杂因素纳入分析。词语联想指数和大麻IAT兴奋度D测量是大麻使用的显著预测因素。词语联想指数在大麻使用中解释的方差比IAT或EAST测量更多。此外,大麻使用间接测量的验证性因素分析模型显示,EAST兴奋度和词语联想因素之间存在显著的中度相关性,但词语联想和IAT因素之间没有显著相关性。这些发现表明,不同的间接测量方法之间存在一定程度的趋同,但这些评估似乎也挖掘了关联过程的不同方面。本研究中评估的间接测量类型提供了与物质使用相关的自发认知信息,捕捉了传统行为外显评估未评估的对行为的影响。这项工作的发现为越来越多的研究增添了内容,这些研究表明内隐联想过程在风险和健康行为中的重要性。

相似文献

1
Comparison of indirect assessments of association as predictors of marijuana use among at-risk adolescents.
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2007 Apr;15(2):204-18. doi: 10.1037/1064-1297.15.2.218.
2
Reducing the influence of extrapersonal associations on the Implicit Association Test: personalizing the IAT.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 May;86(5):653-67. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.5.653.
3
Memory activation and expectancy as prospective predictors of alcohol and marijuana use.
J Abnorm Psychol. 1997 Feb;106(1):61-73. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.106.1.61.
4
Does substance use affect reliabilities of the Implicit Association Test?
J Soc Psychol. 2007 Feb;147(1):27-40. doi: 10.3200/SOCP.147.1.27-40.
5
Using the implicit association test to measure self-esteem and self-concept.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 Dec;79(6):1022-38. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.79.6.1022.
6
Adolescents at risk for drug abuse: a 3-year dual-process analysis.
Addiction. 2017 May;112(5):852-863. doi: 10.1111/add.13742. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
8
Application of item response theory to tests of substance-related associative memory.
Psychol Addict Behav. 2014 Sep;28(3):852-62. doi: 10.1037/a0035877. Epub 2014 Aug 18.
9
Explicit and implicit effects of anti-marijuana and anti-tobacco TV advertisements.
Addict Behav. 2007 Jan;32(1):114-27. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.03.025. Epub 2006 May 3.
10
Functional imaging of implicit marijuana associations during performance on an Implicit Association Test (IAT).
Behav Brain Res. 2013 Nov 1;256:494-502. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.09.013. Epub 2013 Sep 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Expressive Writing About One's Trauma Increases Accessibility of Cannabis Information in Memory Among Trauma-Exposed Individuals.
Cannabis. 2024 Dec 12;7(3):61-73. doi: 10.26828/cannabis/2024/000262. eCollection 2024.
2
Contextualizing Cannabis Implicit Associations: Consideration of Peers and Personality.
Emerg Adulthood. 2022 Jun;10(3):581-594. doi: 10.1177/21676968211021672. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
3
Cognitions mediate the influence of personality on adolescent cannabis use initiation.
Addict Behav Rep. 2022 Apr 9;15:100425. doi: 10.1016/j.abrep.2022.100425. eCollection 2022 Jun.
4
Alcohol use and brain morphology in adolescence: A longitudinal study in three different cohorts.
Eur J Neurosci. 2021 Sep;54(6):6012-6026. doi: 10.1111/ejn.15411. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
5
Acceptance of Drug Use Mediates Future Hard Drug Use Among At-Risk Adolescent Marijuana, Tobacco, and Alcohol Users.
Prev Sci. 2021 Jul;22(5):545-554. doi: 10.1007/s11121-020-01165-9. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
9
Adolescents at risk for drug abuse: a 3-year dual-process analysis.
Addiction. 2017 May;112(5):852-863. doi: 10.1111/add.13742. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
10
Affective decision-making moderates the effects of automatic associations on alcohol use among drug offenders.
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2017 Sep;43(5):534-544. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2016.1216557. Epub 2016 Sep 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Dissociations between implicit and explicit attitudes toward phobic stimuli.
Cogn Emot. 2003 Jul;17(4):521-545. doi: 10.1080/02699930302305.
2
Faulty assumptions: A comment on Blanton, Jaccard, Gonzales, and Christie (2006).
J Exp Soc Psychol. 2007 May;43(3):393-398. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2006.10.018.
3
Alcohol-related associative strength and drinking behaviours: concurrent and prospective relationships.
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2005 Nov;24(6):489-98. doi: 10.1080/09595230500337675.
4
Assessing implicit alcohol associations with the Implicit Association Test: fact or artifact?
Addict Behav. 2006 Aug;31(8):1346-62. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2005.10.009. Epub 2005 Dec 2.
5
Challenging implicit and explicit alcohol-related cognitions in young heavy drinkers.
Addiction. 2005 Jun;100(6):806-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01064.x.
6
Employment discrimination: the role of implicit attitudes, motivation, and a climate for racial bias.
J Appl Psychol. 2005 May;90(3):553-62. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.3.553.
8
Memory encoding in Alzheimer's disease: an fMRI study of explicit and implicit memory.
Brain. 2005 Apr;128(Pt 4):773-87. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh400. Epub 2005 Feb 10.
9
The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms.
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2004 Aug;36(3):402-7. doi: 10.3758/bf03195588.
10
Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: II. Method variables and construct validity.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2005 Feb;31(2):166-80. doi: 10.1177/0146167204271418.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验