Ames Susan L, Grenard Jerry L, Thush Carolien, Sussman Steve, Wiers Reinout W, Stacy Alan W
Institute for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Research, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 91803, USA.
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2007 Apr;15(2):204-18. doi: 10.1037/1064-1297.15.2.218.
In this study, the authors compared indirect measures that attempt to quantify the level of marijuana associations among adolescents. They also evaluated whether these various methods overlap or tap different aspects of associative processes that may act in concert to influence marijuana use. Automatic drug-relevant associations were assessed in 121 at-risk youth in continuation high schools in California with the use of a word association index and computer-based, reaction time measures (i.e., Implicit Association Test [IAT] and Extrinsic Affective Simon Task [EAST]). Measures of working memory capacity, sensation seeking, and explicit cognitions also were included in analyses as potential confounders. The word association index and the marijuana IAT excited D measure were significant predictors of marijuana use. The word association index accounted for more variance in marijuana use than did the IAT or EAST measures. Further, confirmatory factor analytic models of the indirect measures of marijuana use revealed a significant moderate correlation between the EAST Excitement and Word Association factors but no significant correlations between the Word Association and IAT factors. These findings suggest that there is some convergence among the different indirect measures, but these assessments also appear to tap different aspects of associative processes. The types of indirect measures evaluated in this work provide information about spontaneous cognitions related to substance use, capturing influences on behavior that are not evaluated with traditional explicit assessments of behavior. Findings from this work add to a growing body of research that implicates the importance of implicit associative processes in risk and health behaviors.
在本研究中,作者比较了旨在量化青少年中大麻关联程度的间接测量方法。他们还评估了这些不同方法是否重叠,或者是否挖掘了可能共同作用以影响大麻使用的关联过程的不同方面。利用一个词语联想指数和基于计算机的反应时间测量方法(即内隐联想测验[IAT]和外在情感西蒙任务[EAST]),对加利福尼亚州继续教育高中的121名高危青少年的自动药物相关联想进行了评估。工作记忆容量、感觉寻求和外显认知的测量也作为潜在混杂因素纳入分析。词语联想指数和大麻IAT兴奋度D测量是大麻使用的显著预测因素。词语联想指数在大麻使用中解释的方差比IAT或EAST测量更多。此外,大麻使用间接测量的验证性因素分析模型显示,EAST兴奋度和词语联想因素之间存在显著的中度相关性,但词语联想和IAT因素之间没有显著相关性。这些发现表明,不同的间接测量方法之间存在一定程度的趋同,但这些评估似乎也挖掘了关联过程的不同方面。本研究中评估的间接测量类型提供了与物质使用相关的自发认知信息,捕捉了传统行为外显评估未评估的对行为的影响。这项工作的发现为越来越多的研究增添了内容,这些研究表明内隐联想过程在风险和健康行为中的重要性。