Mitchell Jason P, Heatherton Todd F, Kelley William M, Wyland Carrie L, Wegner Daniel M, Neil Macrae C
Department of Psychology, Harvard University, 33 Kirkland Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Psychol Sci. 2007 Apr;18(4):292-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01891.x.
Cognitive theories of how people regulate their thoughts have suggested the involvement of two control processes that occur over different time courses. These cognitive accounts parallel recent neural models of executive control, which suggest that the prefrontal cortex (PFC) mediates sustained changes in the allocation of control processes, whereas the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) relays a transient need for additional control. Combining these cognitive and neural models of control, we used recently developed analysis techniques to distinguish transient from sustained changes in brain activation while subjects attempted to suppress an unwanted thought. Results were consistent with both models: Dorsolateral PFC demonstrated sustained increases in activation during attempts at thought suppression, whereas bilateral ACC demonstrated transient increases associated with occurrences of unwanted thoughts. These data support proposals regarding the different contributions made by the PFC and ACC to executive control and provide initial neuroimaging support for dual-process models of how individuals regulate their thoughts.
关于人们如何调节自身思维的认知理论表明,存在两个在不同时间进程中发生的控制过程。这些认知解释与近期的执行控制神经模型相似,该模型表明前额叶皮层(PFC)介导控制过程分配中的持续变化,而前扣带回皮层(ACC)传递对额外控制的短暂需求。结合这些控制的认知和神经模型,我们使用最近开发的分析技术,在受试者试图抑制一个不必要的想法时,区分大脑激活中的短暂变化和持续变化。结果与两个模型均一致:背外侧前额叶皮层在试图抑制思维时激活持续增加,而双侧前扣带回皮层的激活则与不必要想法的出现相关联而短暂增加。这些数据支持了关于前额叶皮层和前扣带回皮层对执行控制的不同贡献的提议,并为个体如何调节自身思维的双过程模型提供了初步的神经影像学支持。