Harris Andrew L
Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, New Jersey Medical School of UMDNJ, Newark, NJ 07103, USA.
Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2007 May-Jun;94(1-2):120-43. doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2007.03.011. Epub 2007 Mar 19.
Connexin channels are known to be permeable to a variety of cytoplasmic molecules. The first observation of second messenger junctional permeability, made approximately 30 years ago, sparked broad interest in gap junction channels as mediators of intercellular molecular signaling. Since then, much has been learned about the diversity of connexin channels with regard to isoform diversity, tissue and developmental distribution, modes of channel regulation, assembly, expression, biochemical modification and permeability, all of which appear to be dynamically regulated. This information has expanded the potential roles of connexin channels in development, physiology and disease, and made their elucidation much more complex--30 years ago such an orchestra of junctional dynamics was unanticipated. Only recently, however, have investigators been able to directly address, in this more complex framework, the key issue: what specific biological molecules, second messengers and others, are able to permeate the various types of connexin channels, and how well? An important related issue, given the ever-growing list of connexin-related pathologies, is how these permeabilities are altered by disease-causing connexin mutations. Together, many studies show that a variety of cytoplasmic molecules can permeate the different types of connexin channels. A few studies reveal differences in permeation by different molecules through a particular type of connexin channel, and differences in permeation by a particular molecule through different types of connexin channels. This article describes and evaluates the various methods used to obtain these data, presents an annotated compilation of the results, and discusses the findings in the context of what can be inferred about mechanism of selectivity and potential relevance to signaling. The data strongly suggest that highly specific interactions take place between connexin pores and specific biological molecular permeants, and that those interactions determine which cytoplasmic molecules can permeate and how well. At this time, the nature of those interactions is unclear. One hopes that with more detailed permeability and structural information, the specific molecular mechanisms of the selectivity can be elucidated.
已知连接蛋白通道可通透多种细胞质分子。大约30年前首次观察到第二信使的连接通透性,这引发了人们对间隙连接通道作为细胞间分子信号传导介质的广泛兴趣。从那时起,人们在连接蛋白通道的多样性方面学到了很多知识,包括亚型多样性、组织和发育分布、通道调节模式、组装、表达、生化修饰和通透性,所有这些似乎都受到动态调节。这些信息扩展了连接蛋白通道在发育、生理和疾病中的潜在作用,并使对它们的阐释变得更加复杂——30年前,这种连接动力学的协调作用是无法预料的。然而,直到最近,研究人员才能够在这个更复杂的框架中直接解决关键问题:哪些特定的生物分子、第二信使和其他分子能够通透各种类型的连接蛋白通道,以及通透程度如何?鉴于与连接蛋白相关的病理状况不断增加,一个重要的相关问题是这些通透性如何因致病的连接蛋白突变而改变。许多研究共同表明,多种细胞质分子可以通透不同类型的连接蛋白通道。一些研究揭示了不同分子通过特定类型的连接蛋白通道的通透差异,以及特定分子通过不同类型的连接蛋白通道的通透差异。本文描述并评估了用于获取这些数据的各种方法,给出了结果的注释汇编,并在关于选择性机制和与信号传导的潜在相关性的推断背景下讨论了这些发现。数据强烈表明,连接蛋白孔与特定的生物分子通透剂之间发生了高度特异性的相互作用,并且这些相互作用决定了哪些细胞质分子能够通透以及通透程度如何。目前,这些相互作用的性质尚不清楚。人们希望,随着更详细的通透性和结构信息的出现,能够阐明选择性的具体分子机制。