Zhang Y Y, Johnson M C, Chow N, Wasserman K
Division of Respiratory and Critical Care Physiology and Medicine, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA 90509.
Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1991;63(2):94-100. doi: 10.1007/BF00235176.
The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of fitness and work level on the O2 uptake and CO2 output kinetics when the increase in work rate step is adjusted to the subject's maximum work capacity. Nine normal male subjects performed progressive incremental cycle ergometer exercise tests in 3-min steps to their maximum tolerance. The work rate step size was selected so that the symptom-limited maximum work rate would be reached in four steps at 12 min in all subjects. Oxygen consumption (VO2) and carbon dioxide production (VCO2) were calculated breath by breath. For the group, the time (mean, SEM) to reach 75% of the 3-min response (T0.75) for VO2 increased significantly (P less than 0.01) at progressively higher work rate steps, being 53.3 (5.5) s, 63.5 (4.6) s, 79.5 (5.0) s, and 94.5 (5.8) s, respectively. In contrast, T0.75 for VCO2 did not change significantly [74.9 (7.4) s, 75.6 (5.0) s, 85.1 (5.3) s, and 89.4 (6.3) s, respectively]. VCO2 kinetics were slower than VO2 kinetics at the low fractions of the subjects' work capacities but were the same or faster at the high fractions because of the slowing of VO2 kinetics. The first step showed the fastest rise in VO2. While VO2 kinetics slowed at each step, they were faster at each fraction of the work capacity in the fitter subjects. The step pattern in VO2 disappeared at high work rates for the less fit subjects.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
本研究的目的是确定当工作速率的增加步长根据受试者的最大工作能力进行调整时,体能和工作水平对氧气摄取量和二氧化碳排出动力学的影响。九名正常男性受试者以3分钟为步长进行递增式自行车测力计运动测试,直至达到最大耐受量。选择工作速率步长,以便所有受试者在12分钟内分四步达到症状限制的最大工作速率。逐次呼吸计算耗氧量(VO2)和二氧化碳生成量(VCO2)。对于该组,在逐渐升高的工作速率步长下,VO2达到3分钟反应的75%(T0.75)的时间(平均值,标准误)显著增加(P小于0.01),分别为53.3(5.5)秒、63.5(4.6)秒、79.5(5.0)秒和94.5(5.8)秒。相比之下,VCO2的T0.75没有显著变化[分别为74.9(7.4)秒、75.6(5.0)秒、85.1(5.3)秒和89.4(6.3)秒]。在受试者工作能力的低比例阶段,VCO2动力学比VO2动力学慢,但在高比例阶段相同或更快,因为VO2动力学减慢。第一步显示VO2上升最快。虽然VO2动力学在每一步都减慢,但在体能较好的受试者中,在工作能力的每个比例阶段都更快。对于体能较差的受试者来说,VO2的步长模式在高工作速率时消失。(摘要截断于250字)