Inglis Erin Calaine, Rasica Letizia, Iannetta Danilo, Sales Kate M, Keir Daniel A, MacInnis Martin J, Murias Juan M
Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
School of Kinesiology, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2025 May;125(5):1297-1310. doi: 10.1007/s00421-024-05674-1. Epub 2024 Dec 5.
This study examined the effect of 3 and 6 weeks of intensity domain-based exercise training on kinetics changes and their relationship with indices of performance.
Eighty-four young healthy participants (42 M, 42 F) were randomly assigned to six groups (14 participants each, age and sex-matched) consisting of: continuous cycling in the (1) moderate (MOD)-, (2) lower heavy (HVY1)-, and (3) upper heavy-intensity (HVY2)- domain; interval cycling in the (4) severe-intensity domain (i.e., high-intensity interval training (HIIT), or (5) extreme-intensity domain (i.e., sprint-interval training (SIT)); or (6) control (CON). Training participants completed two three-week phases of three supervised sessions per week, with physiological evaluations performed at PRE, MID and POST intervention. All training protocols, except SIT, were work-matched.
There was a significant time effect for the time constant ( ) between PRE (31.6 ± 10.4 s) and MID (22.6 ± 6.9 s) (p < 0.05) and PRE and POST (21.8 ± 6.3 s) (p < 0.05), but no difference between MID and POST (p > 0.05) and no group or interaction effects (p > 0.05). There were no PRE to POST differences for CON (p < 0.05) in any variables. Despite significant increases in maximal ( ), estimated lactate threshold (θ), maximal metabolic steady state (MMSS), and peak power output (PPO) for the intervention groups (p < 0.05), there were no significant correlations from PRE to MID or MID to POST between and (r = - 0.221, r = 0.119), ΔPPO (r = - 0.112, r = - 0.017), Δθ (r = 0.083, r = 0.142) and ΔMMSS (r = - 0.213, r = 0.049)(p > 0.05).
This study demonstrated that (i) the rapid speeding of kinetics was not intensity-dependent; and (ii) changes in indices of performance were not significantly correlated with .
本研究探讨基于强度域的3周和6周运动训练对动力学变化及其与运动表现指标关系的影响。
84名年轻健康参与者(42名男性,42名女性)被随机分为六组(每组14名参与者,年龄和性别匹配),包括:在(1)中等强度(MOD)、(2)低高强度(HVY1)和(3)超高强度(HVY2)域进行持续骑行;在(4)高强度域进行间歇骑行(即高强度间歇训练(HIIT)),或在(5)极限强度域进行间歇骑行(即冲刺间歇训练(SIT));或(6)对照组(CON)。训练参与者完成两个为期三周的阶段,每周进行三次有监督的训练,并在干预前、中期和后期进行生理评估。除SIT外,所有训练方案的工作量均匹配。
干预前(31.6±10.4秒)与中期(22.6±6.9秒)(p<0.05)以及干预前与后期(21.8±6.3秒)(p<0.05)之间的时间常数( )存在显著的时间效应,但中期与后期之间无差异(p>0.05),也无组间或交互效应(p>0.05)。对照组在任何变量上干预前与后期均无差异(p<0.05)。尽管干预组的最大 ( )、估计乳酸阈值(θ)、最大代谢稳态(MMSS)和峰值功率输出(PPO)显著增加(p<0.05),但干预前至中期或中期至后期, 与 (r = -0.221,r = 0.119)、ΔPPO(r = -0.112,r = -0.017)、Δθ(r = 0.083,r = 0.142)和ΔMMSS(r = -0.213,r = 0.049)之间均无显著相关性(p>0.05)。
本研究表明:(i) 动力学的快速加快与强度无关;(ii)运动表现指标的变化与 无显著相关性。