• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

语义相似性和前摄干扰在词长效应中的作用。

The roles of semantic similarity and proactive interference in the word length effect.

作者信息

Goh Winston D, Goh Chang Khiang

机构信息

Department of Psychology, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117570.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Dec;13(6):978-84. doi: 10.3758/bf03213912.

DOI:10.3758/bf03213912
PMID:17484422
Abstract

We examined the influence of semantic similarity and proactive interference (PI) on the word length effect (WLE) in immediate serial recall. Word length was manipulated by comparing memory for monosyllabic versus multisyllabic words. PI effects were evaluated by manipulating semantic similarity in the to-be-remembered lists and examining its impact on the WLE's magnitude across eight-trial blocks. Words were sampled from a single semantic category across the entire block, from a single category within the list, or from different categories. Robust WLEs were observed in single-category blocks and when words were from different categories. However, when all the within-list words were from the same semantic category, the WLE was sharply attenuated. Except for the within-list semantic similarity condition, there was a buildup in PI levels in the form of protrusion errors across trials. However, the magnitude of the WLE did not increase with the PI buildup, suggesting that it was not affected by PI across trials.

摘要

我们研究了语义相似性和前摄干扰(PI)对即时系列回忆中词长效应(WLE)的影响。通过比较单音节词和多音节词的记忆来操纵词长。通过操纵待记忆列表中的语义相似性,并检查其对八个试验块中WLE大小的影响来评估PI效应。在整个试验块中,单词从单一语义类别中抽取,或从列表中的单个类别中抽取,或从不同类别中抽取。在单类别试验块以及单词来自不同类别的情况下,观察到了强烈的词长效应。然而,当列表中的所有单词都来自同一语义类别时,词长效应会急剧减弱。除了列表内语义相似性条件外,在各试验中,以突出错误的形式出现了前摄干扰水平的累积。然而,词长效应的大小并没有随着前摄干扰的累积而增加,这表明它在各试验中不受前摄干扰的影响。

相似文献

1
The roles of semantic similarity and proactive interference in the word length effect.语义相似性和前摄干扰在词长效应中的作用。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Dec;13(6):978-84. doi: 10.3758/bf03213912.
2
When does word meaning affect immediate serial recall in semantic dementia?在语义性痴呆中,词义何时会影响即时系列回忆?
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2004 Mar;4(1):20-42. doi: 10.3758/cabn.4.1.20.
3
Release from PI: An analysis and a model.脱离 PI:分析与模型。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Jun;25(3):932-950. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1327-3.
4
Electrophysiological evidence that release from proactive inhibition reflects late semantic processing.电生理学证据表明,前摄性抑制的释放反映了晚期语义加工。
Psychophysiology. 2020 Oct;57(10):e13639. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13639. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
5
Semantic memory is key to binding phonology: converging evidence from immediate serial recall in semantic dementia and healthy participants.语义记忆是语音绑定的关键:来自语义性痴呆患者和健康参与者即时系列回忆的汇聚证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2009 Feb;47(3):747-60. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.12.001. Epub 2008 Dec 9.
6
Exploring semantic memory by investigating buildup and release of proactive interference in healthy older adults and individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer type.通过研究健康老年人和阿尔茨海默病型痴呆患者中前摄干扰的积累和释放来探索语义记忆。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2003 Sep;9(6):830-8. doi: 10.1017/S1355617703960024.
7
Effects of phonological similarity and concurrent irrelevant articulation on short-term-memory recall of repeated and novel word lists.语音相似性和同时进行的无关发音对重复和新颖单词列表的短期记忆回忆的影响。
Mem Cognit. 1993 Jul;21(4):539-45. doi: 10.3758/bf03197185.
8
Proactive interference in a semantic short-term memory deficit: role of semantic and phonological relatedness.语义短期记忆缺陷中的前摄干扰:语义和语音相关性的作用。
Cortex. 2007 Jan;43(1):112-23. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70449-0.
9
Memory for related and unrelated words: further evidence on the influence of semantic factors in immediate serial recall.对相关和不相关单词的记忆:关于语义因素对即时系列回忆影响的进一步证据。
Q J Exp Psychol A. 1995 May;48(2):384-404. doi: 10.1080/14640749508401396.
10
Semantic similarity and immediate serial recall: is there a detrimental effect on order information?语义相似性与即时系列回忆:对顺序信息是否存在不利影响?
Q J Exp Psychol A. 1999 May;52(2):367-94. doi: 10.1080/713755814.

引用本文的文献

1
Aversive memories can be weakened during human sleep via the reactivation of positive interfering memories.人类在睡眠期间可以通过激活积极的干扰性记忆来削弱令人不快的记忆。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Jul 30;121(31):e2400678121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2400678121. Epub 2024 Jul 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Word-length effects in immediate memory: Overwriting trace decay theory.即时记忆中的词长效应:覆盖痕迹衰减理论。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1995 Dec;2(4):429-41. doi: 10.3758/BF03210981.
2
Is spoken duration a sufficient explanation of the word length effect?言语持续时间能否充分解释词长效应?
Memory. 2005 Apr-May;13(3-4):372-9. doi: 10.1080/09658210344000305.
3
An item/order trade-off explanation of word length and generation effects.词长与生成效应的项目/顺序权衡解释。
Memory. 2005 Apr-May;13(3-4):364-71. doi: 10.1080/09658210344000341.
4
Abolishing the word-length effect.消除词长效应。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Jan;30(1):98-106. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.1.98.
5
Theoretical implications of articulatory duration, phonological similarity, and phonological complexity in verbal working memory.言语工作记忆中发音时长、语音相似性和语音复杂性的理论意义。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003 Nov;29(6):1353-80. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.6.1353.
6
The time-based word length effect and stimulus set specificity.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Jun;10(2):430-4. doi: 10.3758/bf03196502.
7
Effects of lexical competition on immediate memory span for spoken words.词汇竞争对口语单词即时记忆广度的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2003 Aug;56(6):929-54. doi: 10.1080/02724980244000710.
8
List composition and the word length effect in immediate recall: a comparison of localist and globalist assumptions.即时回忆中的列表构成与词长效应:局部主义与整体主义假设的比较
Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Mar;10(1):74-9. doi: 10.3758/bf03196469.
9
Word-frequency and phonological-neighborhood effects on verbal short-term memory.词频和语音邻域对言语短期记忆的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002 Nov;28(6):1019-34. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.28.6.1019.
10
Word length effects are not due to proactive interference.
Memory. 2002 Mar;10(2):139-49. doi: 10.1080/09658210143000272.