Hulme Charles, Suprenant Aimée M, Bireta Tamra J, Stuart George, Neath Ian
Department of Psychology, University of York, York, United Kingdom.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Jan;30(1):98-106. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.1.98.
The authors report 2 experiments that compare the recall of long and short words in pure and mixed lists. In pure lists, long words were much more poorly remembered than short words. In mixed lists, this word-length effect was abolished and both the long and short words were recalled as well as short words in pure lists. These findings contradict current models that seek to explain the word-length effect in terms of item-based effects such as difficulty in assembling items, or in terms of list-based accounts of rehearsal speed. An alternative explanation, drawing on ideas of item complexity and item distinctiveness, is proposed.
作者报告了两项实验,比较了纯列表和混合列表中长单词和短单词的回忆情况。在纯列表中,长单词的记忆效果比短单词差得多。在混合列表中,这种单词长度效应消失了,长单词和短单词的回忆效果与纯列表中的短单词一样好。这些发现与当前试图从基于项目的效应(如组装项目的难度)或基于列表的复述速度解释单词长度效应的模型相矛盾。本文提出了一种基于项目复杂性和项目独特性的替代解释。