Suppr超能文献

任务切换并非线索切换。

Task switching is not cue switching.

作者信息

Altmann Erik M

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Dec;13(6):1016-22. doi: 10.3758/bf03213918.

Abstract

With the aim of reducing cognitive control in task switching to simpler processes, researchers have proposed in a series of recent studies that there is little more to switching tasks than switching cues. The present study addresses three questions concerning this reduction hypothesis. First, does switching cues account for all relevant variance associated with switching tasks? Second, how well does this hypothesis generalize beyond the experimental procedure from which it was developed? Third, how well does this new procedure preserve relevant measures such as task-switch cost? The answers (no; not very; not very) suggest that task switching does not reduce to cue switching.

摘要

为了将任务切换中的认知控制简化为更简单的过程,研究人员在最近的一系列研究中提出,任务切换只不过是线索切换而已。本研究针对这一简化假设提出了三个问题。第一,线索切换是否解释了与任务切换相关的所有方差?第二,该假设在其最初形成的实验程序之外的推广程度如何?第三,这个新程序在多大程度上保留了诸如任务切换成本等相关指标?答案(否;不太好;不太好)表明任务切换并不能简化为线索切换。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验