Hirsch Patricia, Nolden Sophie, Philipp Andrea M, Koch Iring
Department of Cognitive and Experimental Psychology, Institute of Psychology, RWTH Aachen University, Jägerstr. 17-19, 52066, Aachen, Germany.
Psychol Res. 2018 Jul;82(4):759-770. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0851-0. Epub 2017 Mar 11.
To examine whether hierarchical higher level task representations comprising the task sets of Task 1 (T1) and Task 2 (T2) are activated within each trial in dual-task situations, we combined the psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm with the task-pair switching logic (Hirsch et al. 2017). In Experiment 1, in which subjects switched between task-pairs including a varying T1 and a constant T2, we found a PRP effect (i.e., worse performance with short stimulus onset asynchrony [SOA] than with long SOA) and task-pair switch costs in T1 and T2 (impaired performance in task-pair switches compared to task-pair repetitions). However, since in Experiment 1 there were no forward and backward response-response compatibility effects that indicated interference between T1 and T2, we could not exclude that the activation of T1 persisted into the next trial despite the intervening T2, and hence, that task-pair switch costs are due to repetition-priming effects of T1 across task-pairs rather than due to persisting activation of task-pair representations. In Experiment 2, we used a modified task-pair switching logic with a constant T1 and a varying T2, and replicated task-pair switch costs under conditions that not only rule out repetition-priming effects of T1 across task-pairs as the source of task-pair switch costs but also disentangle the effects of switching task-pairs from those of switching T1. These effects were associated in previous studies using the original task-pair switching logic. Thus, the findings of the present study strongly suggest that hierarchical higher level task representations are activated during dual-task processing.
为了检验在双任务情境中,每次试验内是否激活了由任务1(T1)和任务2(T2)的任务集组成的分层高级任务表征,我们将心理不应期(PRP)范式与任务对切换逻辑相结合(Hirsch等人,2017)。在实验1中,受试者在包括变化的T1和恒定的T2的任务对之间进行切换,我们发现了PRP效应(即,与长刺激起始异步[SOA]相比,短SOA时表现更差)以及T1和T2中的任务对切换成本(与任务对重复相比,任务对切换时表现受损)。然而,由于在实验1中没有表明T1和T2之间存在干扰的前向和后向反应-反应兼容性效应,我们不能排除尽管有中间的T2,T1的激活仍持续到下一次试验,因此,任务对切换成本是由于T1在任务对之间的重复启动效应,而不是由于任务对表征的持续激活。在实验2中,我们使用了一种修改后的任务对切换逻辑,其中T1恒定,T2变化,并在不仅排除T1在任务对之间的重复启动效应作为任务对切换成本来源,而且将任务对切换的影响与T1切换的影响区分开来的条件下重复了任务对切换成本。在先前使用原始任务对切换逻辑的研究中,这些影响是相关联的。因此,本研究的结果强烈表明,分层高级任务表征在双任务处理过程中被激活。