Altmann Erik M
Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA.
Mem Cognit. 2004 Jan;32(1):153-63. doi: 10.3758/bf03195828.
A common finding in task-switching studies is switch preparation (commonly known as the preparation effect), in which a longer interval between task cue and trial stimulus (i.e., a longer stimulus onset asynchrony, or SOA) reduces the cost of switching to a different task. Three experiments link switch preparation to within-subjects manipulations of SOA. In Experiment 1, SOA was randomized within subjects, producing switch preparation that was more pronounced when the SOA switched from the previous trial than when the SOA repeated. In Experiment 2, SOA was blocked within subjects, producing switch preparation but not on the first block of trials. In Experiment 3, SOA was manipulated between subjects with sufficient statistical power to detect switch preparation, but the effect was absent. The results favor an encoding view of cognitive control, but show that any putative switching mechanism reacts lazily when exposed to only one SOA.
任务切换研究中的一个常见发现是切换准备(通常称为准备效应),即任务提示与试验刺激之间的间隔时间越长(即刺激开始异步时间越长,或SOA),切换到不同任务的成本就越低。三个实验将切换准备与SOA的受试者内操作联系起来。在实验1中,SOA在受试者内随机化,当SOA与前一次试验相比发生切换时,产生的切换准备比SOA重复时更为明显。在实验2中,SOA在受试者内被分块,产生了切换准备,但在试验的第一个块中没有。在实验3中,在受试者之间操纵SOA,具有足够的统计能力来检测切换准备,但未发现该效应。结果支持认知控制的编码观点,但表明任何假定的切换机制在仅暴露于一种SOA时反应迟缓。