Soliman Osama I I, Knaapen Paul, Geleijnse Marcel L, Dijkmans Pieter A, Anwar Ashraf M, Nemes Attila, Michels Michelle, Vletter Wim B, Lammertsma Adriaan A, ten Cate Folkert J
Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Heart. 2007 Oct;93(10):1204-12. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2006.110460. Epub 2007 May 8.
To assess mechanisms of myocardial perfusion impairment in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM).
Fourteen patients with obstructive HCM (mean (SD) age 53 (10) years, 11 men) underwent intravenous adenosine myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE), positron emission tomography (PET) and cardiac catheterisation. Fourteen healthy volunteers (mean age 31 (4) years, 11 men) served as controls. Relative myocardial blood volume (rBV), exchange flow velocity (beta), myocardial blood flow (MBF), MBF reserve (MFR) and endocardial-to-subepicardial (endo-to-epi) MBF ratio were measured from the steady state and contrast replenishment time-intensity curves.
Patients with HCM had lower rest MBF (for LVRPP-corrected)--mean (SD) (0.92 (0.12) vs 1.13 (0.25) ml/min/g, p<0.01)--and hyperaemic MBF--(2.56 (0.49) vs 4.34 (0.78) ml/min/g, p<0.01) than controls. Resting rBV was lower in patients with HCM (0.094 (0.016) vs 0.138 (0.014) ml/ml), and during hyperaemia (0.104 (0.018) ml/ml vs 0.185 (0.024) ml/ml) (all p<0.001) than in controls. beta tended to be higher in HCM at rest (9.4 (4.6) vs 7.7 (4.2) ml/min) and during hyperaemia (25.8 (6.4) vs 23.1 (6.2) ml/min) than in controls. Septal endo-to-epi MBF decreased during hyperaemia (0.86 (0.15) to 0.64 (0.18), p<0.01). rBV was inversely correlated with left ventricular (LV) mass index (p<0.05). Both hyperaemic and endo-to-epi MBF were inversely correlated with LV end-diastolic pressure, LV mass index, and LV outflow tract pressure gradient (all p<0.05). MCE-derived MBF correlated well with PET at rest (r = 0.84) and hyperaemia (r = 0.87) (all p<0.001).
In patients with HCM, LV end-diastolic pressure, LV outflow tract pressure gradient, and LV mass index are independent predictors of rBV and hyperaemic MBF.
评估肥厚型心肌病(HCM)患者心肌灌注受损的机制。
14例梗阻性HCM患者(平均(标准差)年龄53(10)岁,男性11例)接受静脉注射腺苷心肌对比超声心动图(MCE)、正电子发射断层扫描(PET)和心导管检查。14名健康志愿者(平均年龄31(4)岁,男性11例)作为对照。从稳态和对比剂补充时间-强度曲线测量相对心肌血容量(rBV)、交换流速(β)、心肌血流量(MBF)、MBF储备(MFR)以及心内膜与心外膜下(心内膜至心外膜)MBF比值。
HCM患者静息MBF(经左心室射血压力-功率乘积校正后)——平均(标准差)(0.92(0.12)对1.13(0.25)ml/min/g,p<0.01)——和充血状态下的MBF——(2.56(0.49)对4.34(0.78)ml/min/g,p<0.01)均低于对照组。HCM患者静息时rBV较低(0.094(0.016)对0.138(0.014)ml/ml),充血时(0.104(0.018)ml/ml对0.185(0.024)ml/ml)也较低(均p<0.001)。HCM患者静息时β倾向于较高(9.4(4.6)对7.7(4.2)ml/min),充血时(25.8(6.4)对23.1(6.2)ml/min)也较高。充血时室间隔心内膜至心外膜MBF降低(0.86(0.15)至0.64(0.18),p<0.01)。rBV与左心室(LV)质量指数呈负相关(p<0.05)。充血时MBF和心内膜至心外膜MBF均与LV舒张末期压力、LV质量指数和LV流出道压力梯度呈负相关(均p<0.05)。MCE得出的MBF与PET在静息时(r = 0.84)和充血时(r = 0.87)相关性良好(均p<0.001)。
在HCM患者中,LV舒张末期压力、LV流出道压力梯度和LV质量指数是rBV和充血时MBF的独立预测因素。