Bardhan Karna D, Berghöfer Peter
District General Hospital, Rotherham, UK.
Digestion. 2007;75 Suppl 1:87-100. doi: 10.1159/000101020. Epub 2007 May 4.
UNLABELLED: The ReQuest (Reflux Questionnaire) is a new instrument: a diary developed specifically to allow patients to measure the totality of their gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms and to track changes each day during treatment, an increasingly important need in clinical trials. This paper reviews the background, development, testing, and validation of the instrument and shows how its flexibility allows it to be used in new ways to assess different aspects of GERD. DEVELOPMENT: There were four key steps. (1) A full symptom spectrum was gathered from experts, literature and, crucially, from GERD patients, and comprised 67 symptom descriptions. (2) By expert consensus, these symptom descriptions were empirically condensed into six easier-to-handle 'dimensions' (acid complaints, upper abdominal/stomach complaints, lower abdominal/digestive complaints, nausea, sleep disturbances, other complaints), to which the seventh, general well-being, was added, a key feature of the instrument. The symptom burden of each dimension is measured as frequency x intensity (general well-being: intensity only). (3) This prototype instrument was tested in PPI clinical trials involving patients with erosive and non-erosive GERD, while the data generated were used to validate the prototype. (4) Finally, the scale was refined by factor analysis, a statistical process. OUTCOME: Detailed statistical testing validating the scale and factor analysis confirmed that empirically condensing the symptom descriptions into dimensions did not affect the measurement properties of the instrument. FURTHER APPLICATION: The structure of ReQuest and its product, which is numerical, makes the instrument highly flexible and allows for its use in other GERD areas. (1) Its subscales, ReQuest-GI and ReQuest-WSO, measure symptoms traditionally associated with reflux and with general well-being, respectively, and permit these to be quantified and tracked independently. (2) Minor degrees of reflux symptoms are common amongst the healthy. The level was determined in a large population without evidence of disease, and a 'GERD symptom threshold' calculated. Reduction below this threshold to 'background levels' is a more realistic end point in clinical trials than the rarely achieved 'complete absence'. (3) ReQuest-GI was re-scaled and integrated with the modified Los Angeles scale used to grade esophageal appearances at endoscopy. The new instrument is a matrix, the ReQuest/LA-classification, which allows both symptoms and endoscopy appearances to be expressed by a single set of numbers in individual patients and in populations. (4) This in turn allows identification of patients who on treatment achieve 'complete remission', i.e. healing and symptom relief. PPI clinical trials confirm that it takes a longer period of treatment to reach this endpoint than healing or symptom relief alone. Thus the conventional 4-8 weeks of PPI therapy may unwittingly result in under-treatment. (5) Studies are in progress to determine the 'minimum clinically important difference' (MCID). This is the minimum change measured on treatment, which is judged as being of clinical benefit, an increasingly important subject. (6) Finally, the ReQuest used in clinical trials has been simplified for application in day-to-day clinical practice. The results obtained with 'ReQuest in Practice', the simplified version, are similar to those observed with the full version, as confirmed in a large-scale study in general practice. The clinical practice version has also been validated. CONCLUSION: (1) The characteristics of ReQuest make it suitable for use as the primary endpoint in clinical trials assessing the outcome of GERD. (2) The subscales allows for closer examination on the nature of GERD and response to treatment. (3) A simplified version has proven suitable for use in daily practice.
未标注:反流问卷(ReQuest)是一种新工具:一本专门设计的日记,用于让患者衡量其胃食管反流病(GERD)症状的总体情况,并在治疗期间每天跟踪变化,这在临床试验中是一项日益重要的需求。本文回顾了该工具的背景、开发、测试和验证过程,并展示了其灵活性如何使其能够以新的方式用于评估GERD的不同方面。 开发:有四个关键步骤。(1)从专家、文献以及关键的GERD患者中收集了完整的症状谱,包括67种症状描述。(2)通过专家共识,这些症状描述经实证归纳为六个更易于处理的“维度”(反酸症状、上腹部/胃部症状、下腹部/消化系统症状、恶心、睡眠障碍、其他症状),并增加了第七个维度,即总体健康状况,这是该工具的一个关键特征。每个维度的症状负担通过频率×强度来衡量(总体健康状况:仅衡量强度)。(3)该原型工具在涉及糜烂性和非糜烂性GERD患者的质子泵抑制剂(PPI)临床试验中进行了测试,同时所产生的数据用于验证该原型。(4)最后,通过因子分析这一统计过程对量表进行了完善。 结果:详细的统计测试验证了该量表,因子分析证实将症状描述实证归纳为维度不会影响该工具的测量特性。 进一步应用:ReQuest的结构及其数字化的形式使其具有高度的灵活性,并可用于GERD的其他领域。(1)其子量表ReQuest - GI和ReQuest - WSO分别测量传统上与反流和总体健康状况相关的症状,并允许对这些症状进行独立量化和跟踪。(2)轻度反流症状在健康人群中很常见。在一大群无疾病证据的人群中确定了该水平,并计算出“GERD症状阈值”。在临床试验中相较于很少能达到的“完全无症状”,降至该阈值以下至“背景水平”是一个更现实的终点。((3)对ReQuest - GI进行重新标度,并与用于在内镜检查时对食管外观进行分级的改良洛杉矶量表相结合。新工具是一个矩阵,即ReQuest/LA分类法,它允许在个体患者和人群中用一组数字来表示症状和内镜检查结果。(4)这进而能够识别出在治疗后实现“完全缓解”的患者,即愈合且症状缓解。PPI临床试验证实,达到这一终点所需的治疗时间比仅实现愈合或症状缓解要长。因此,传统的4 - 8周PPI治疗可能会无意中导致治疗不足。(5)正在进行研究以确定“最小临床重要差异”(MCID)。这是治疗中测量到的最小变化,被判定具有临床益处,这是一个日益重要的课题。(6)最后,用于临床试验的ReQuest已被简化以便应用于日常临床实践。在一项全科医疗的大规模研究中证实,简化版“实践中的ReQuest”所获得的结果与完整版相似。临床实践版也已得到验证。 结论:(1)ReQuest的特性使其适合用作评估GERD治疗结果的临床试验的主要终点。(2)子量表允许更深入地研究GERD的本质和对治疗的反应。(3)简化版已被证明适用于日常实践。
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2004
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007-12
Thorac Surg Clin. 2005-8
Drugs Today (Barc). 2004-3
World J Gastroenterol. 2011-7-21
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2008-12