• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚特别护理托儿所中对呼吸窘迫婴儿使用持续气道正压通气(CPAP)。

CPAP use in babies with respiratory distress in Australian special care nurseries.

作者信息

Buckmaster Adam G, Arnolda Gaston Rb, Wright Ian Mr, Henderson-Smart David J

机构信息

Northern Sydney Central Coast Area Health Service, Gosford Hospital, Gosford, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

J Paediatr Child Health. 2007 May;43(5):376-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2007.01083.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1440-1754.2007.01083.x
PMID:17489828
Abstract

AIM

This study sought to identify the number of special care nurseries (SCNs) already using CPAP in 2004, and the number considering its use in the following 2 years, and to describe the characteristics of those hospitals.

METHODS

All Australian hospitals with >200 registered deliveries in the year 2002, a SCN and at least one paediatrician were eligible (n = 157). Separate questionnaires were sent to the nurse unit manager (NUM) and the paediatrician responsible for the SCN in late 2004.

RESULTS

Of 157 eligible SCNs, 143 (91%) responded. CPAP was being used in 24/143 (17%). Of those nurseries not already using CPAP a further 45/119 (38%) were considering doing so in 2005/2006. State/Territory, greater availability of junior medical staff, use of a helicopter/airplane for transferring infants to tertiary centres and number of paediatricians were significantly associated with use of CPAP (all P < 0.05). Consideration of use was significantly associated with greater availability of junior medical staff, larger numbers of births and time to nearest (tertiary) centre (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

There is a strong predisposition for the use of CPAP in SCNs despite the lack of evidence for its benefits or risks there. Studies are urgently required on the clinical benefits and risks of CPAP in a non-tertiary centre before the widespread introduction of CPAP takes place.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定2004年已在使用持续气道正压通气(CPAP)的特殊护理病房(SCN)数量,以及在接下来两年中考虑使用CPAP的数量,并描述这些医院的特征。

方法

2002年登记分娩量超过200例、设有SCN且至少有一名儿科医生的所有澳大利亚医院均符合条件(n = 157)。2004年末,分别向护士单元经理(NUM)和负责SCN的儿科医生发送了单独的调查问卷。

结果

在157个符合条件的SCN中,143个(91%)做出了回应。24/143(17%)的SCN正在使用CPAP。在尚未使用CPAP的托儿所中,另有45/119(38%)的托儿所考虑在2005/2006年使用。州/领地、初级医务人员的更多可获得性、使用直升机/飞机将婴儿转运至三级中心以及儿科医生数量与CPAP的使用显著相关(所有P < 0.05)。对使用的考虑与初级医务人员的更多可获得性、更高的分娩数量以及到最近(三级)中心的时间显著相关(所有P < 0.05)。

结论

尽管缺乏关于CPAP在SCN中的益处或风险的证据,但在SCN中使用CPAP的倾向很强。在广泛引入CPAP之前,迫切需要对非三级中心中CPAP的临床益处和风险进行研究。

相似文献

1
CPAP use in babies with respiratory distress in Australian special care nurseries.澳大利亚特别护理托儿所中对呼吸窘迫婴儿使用持续气道正压通气(CPAP)。
J Paediatr Child Health. 2007 May;43(5):376-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2007.01083.x.
2
Practice variation in initial management and transfer thresholds for infants with respiratory distress in Australian hospitals. Who should write the guidelines?澳大利亚医院中对呼吸窘迫婴儿的初始管理和转运阈值的实践差异。该由谁来撰写指南?
J Paediatr Child Health. 2007 Jun;43(6):469-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2007.01113.x.
3
Nasal continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory distress in non-tertiary care centres: what is needed and where to from here?非三级护理中心中用于治疗呼吸窘迫的鼻持续气道正压通气:需要什么以及未来何去何从?
J Paediatr Child Health. 2012 Sep;48(9):747-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2012.02537.x.
4
Out-of-hospital continuous positive airway pressure ventilation versus usual care in acute respiratory failure: a randomized controlled trial.院外持续气道正压通气与常规治疗在急性呼吸衰竭中的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Sep;52(3):232-41, 241.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.01.006. Epub 2008 Apr 3.
5
Neonatal resuscitation educational experience of staff in New South Wales and Australian Capital Territory hospitals.新南威尔士州和澳大利亚首都直辖区医院工作人员的新生儿复苏教育经历。
J Paediatr Child Health. 2006 Jan-Feb;42(1-2):16-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2006.00783.x.
6
Parental stress and satisfaction in the non-tertiary special care nursery.非三级特殊护理托儿所中父母的压力与满意度
J Adv Nurs. 2008 Mar;61(5):522-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04547.x.
7
Targeted oxygen therapy in special care nurseries: is uniformity a good thing?特殊护理病房中的目标性氧疗:一致性是好事吗?
J Paediatr Child Health. 2012 Jun;48(6):476-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2011.02220.x. Epub 2012 Feb 2.
8
High-flow nasal cannulae and nasal continuous positive airway pressure use in non-tertiary special care nurseries in Australia and New Zealand.澳大利亚和新西兰非三级特殊护理托儿所中高流量鼻导管和鼻持续气道正压通气的使用情况。
J Paediatr Child Health. 2012 Jan;48(1):16-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2011.02186.x. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
9
A randomized controlled trial of post-extubation bubble continuous positive airway pressure versus Infant Flow Driver continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome.拔管后气泡持续气道正压通气与婴儿气流驱动持续气道正压通气治疗早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征的随机对照试验
J Pediatr. 2009 May;154(5):645-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.12.034. Epub 2009 Feb 23.
10
Continuous positive airway pressure therapy for infants with respiratory distress in non tertiary care centers: a randomized, controlled trial.非三级护理中心对呼吸窘迫婴儿进行持续气道正压通气治疗:一项随机对照试验。
Pediatrics. 2007 Sep;120(3):509-18. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-0775.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of a novel bubble CPAP system for neonatal respiratory support at a referral hospital in the Philippines.一种新型气泡持续气道正压通气系统在菲律宾一家转诊医院用于新生儿呼吸支持的有效性。
Front Pediatr. 2023 Dec 15;11:1323178. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1323178. eCollection 2023.