Foster Jann, Bidewell John, Buckmaster Adam, Lees Sylvia, Henderson-Smart David
New South Wales Pregnancy and Newborn Services Network, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
J Adv Nurs. 2008 Mar;61(5):522-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04547.x.
This paper is a report of a study examining the effects of using headbox oxygen and continuous oxygen positive airway pressure treatments for respiratory distress on stress and satisfaction of parents with infants in a special care nursery, and the relationship between parental stress and satisfaction.
Continuous positive airway pressure respiratory support is increasingly used in special care nurseries worldwide. Almost nothing is known about effects of different types of respiratory support on the stress and satisfaction of parents with babies in the special care nursery.
Questionnaires were used from August 2004 to June 2006 in five special care nurseries to measure parental stress using an adaptation of the Parental Stressor Scale: Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and 5-point scales to measure overall stress and satisfaction.
Questionnaires were returned from 42 parents of babies receiving headbox oxygen and 51 parents of babies receiving continuous positive airway pressure (62% response rate). High stress was commonly reported. Stress did not differ statistically significantly between the two treatments. Parents with babies receiving continuous positive airway pressure were more satisfied compared to the headbox group. Stress and satisfaction were not statistically significantly correlated.
Clinicians need not favour either method of respiratory support when attempting to minimize parental experience of environmental stress. Further research is needed to test parental stress reduction strategies in the special care nursery.
本文是一项研究报告,探讨在特殊护理病房中,使用头箱给氧和持续气道正压通气治疗呼吸窘迫对婴儿父母压力及满意度的影响,以及父母压力与满意度之间的关系。
持续气道正压通气呼吸支持在全球范围内的特殊护理病房中使用越来越广泛。对于特殊护理病房中不同类型的呼吸支持对婴儿父母压力及满意度的影响,几乎一无所知。
2004年8月至2006年6月期间,在五家特殊护理病房使用问卷调查,采用改编后的《父母压力量表:新生儿重症监护病房》来测量父母压力,并用5分制量表来测量总体压力和满意度。
共收到42名接受头箱给氧婴儿的父母及51名接受持续气道正压通气婴儿的父母返回的问卷(回复率为62%)。普遍报告压力较高。两种治疗方法在压力方面无统计学显著差异。与头箱组相比,接受持续气道正压通气婴儿的父母更满意。压力与满意度无统计学显著相关性。
在试图将父母的环境压力体验降至最低时,临床医生无需偏向任何一种呼吸支持方法。需要进一步研究来测试特殊护理病房中减轻父母压力的策略。