Leibold Christian, Kempter Richard
Institute for Theoretical Biology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Invalidenstrasse 43, 10115 Berlin, Germany.
Cereb Cortex. 2008 Jan;18(1):67-77. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhm037. Epub 2007 May 8.
Synaptic changes impair previously acquired memory traces. The smaller this impairment the larger is the longevity of memories. Two strategies have been suggested to keep memories from being overwritten too rapidly while preserving receptiveness to new contents: either introducing synaptic meta levels that store the history of synaptic state changes or reducing the number of synchronously active neurons, which decreases interference. We find that synaptic metaplasticity indeed can prolong memory lifetimes but only under the restriction that the neuronal population code is not too sparse. For sparse codes, metaplasticity may actually hinder memory longevity. This is important because in memory-related brain regions as the hippocampus population codes are sparse. Comparing 2 different synaptic cascade models with binary weights, we find that a serial topology of synaptic state transitions gives rise to larger memory capacities than a model with cross transitions. For the serial model, memory capacity is virtually independent of network size and connectivity.
突触变化会损害先前获得的记忆痕迹。这种损害越小,记忆的持续时间就越长。已经提出了两种策略来防止记忆被过快覆盖,同时保持对新内容的接受能力:要么引入存储突触状态变化历史的突触元层次,要么减少同步活跃神经元的数量,这会减少干扰。我们发现,突触元可塑性确实可以延长记忆寿命,但前提是神经元群体编码不能过于稀疏。对于稀疏编码,元可塑性实际上可能会阻碍记忆寿命。这一点很重要,因为在与记忆相关的脑区,如海马体,群体编码是稀疏的。比较两种具有二进制权重的不同突触级联模型,我们发现突触状态转换的串行拓扑结构比具有交叉转换的模型具有更大的记忆容量。对于串行模型,记忆容量实际上与网络大小和连通性无关。