Alexander Dominik D, Kelsh Michael A, Mink Pamela J, Mandel Jeffrey H, Basu Rupa, Weingart Michal
Exponent Health Sciences, 185 Hansen Ct, Suite 100, Wood Dale, IL 60191, USA.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2007 Nov;81(2):127-43. doi: 10.1007/s00420-007-0201-4. Epub 2007 May 10.
Findings from epidemiologic studies of trichloroethylene (TCE) exposure and liver cancer have been inconsistent. To quantitatively evaluate this association and to examine sources of heterogeneity, we conducted a meta-analysis of occupational studies of TCE exposure and liver/biliary tract cancer.
We identified 14 occupational cohort studies of TCE exposed workers and one case-control study that met our inclusion criteria. Nine studies specifically identified TCE as a workplace exposure, and were classified as Group I cohort studies. Subcohorts of workers, identified within eight of these studies as more likely exposed to TCE than the total cohort, were analyzed separately.
The combined liver/biliary cancer summary relative risk estimate (SRRE) for all studies was 1.08 (95% CI 0.91-1.29; heterogeneity (H)-P-value=0.12). For the total study populations in the Group I cohorts, the SRRE was 1.14 (95% CI 0.93-1.39; H-P-value=0.05) and for the subcohorts, the SRRE was 1.30 (95% CI 1.09-1.55). Within this subcohort analysis, the association for the European studies of workers from various industries (SRRE=1.38; based on four studies) was higher than the association for the US studies of aerospace and aircraft workers (SRRE=0.97, based on four studies).
Although positive associations were observed for some analyses, results were inconsistent across occupational groups (aerospace/aircraft vs. other industries combined), study location, and incidence versus mortality endpoints. In addition, exposure-response trends were not observed consistently across studies. Interpretation is also limited by the potential impact of uncontrolled confounding by other occupational or lifestyle exposures such as smoking or alcohol consumption. Given these limitations, the currently available epidemiologic data are not sufficient to support a causal relation between occupational TCE exposure and liver/biliary cancer.
三氯乙烯(TCE)暴露与肝癌的流行病学研究结果并不一致。为了定量评估这种关联并检查异质性来源,我们对TCE暴露与肝脏/胆道癌的职业研究进行了荟萃分析。
我们确定了14项符合纳入标准的TCE暴露工人职业队列研究和1项病例对照研究。9项研究明确将TCE确定为工作场所暴露因素,并归类为第一组队列研究。在其中8项研究中确定的比总队列更有可能接触TCE的工人亚队列进行单独分析。
所有研究的肝脏/胆道癌合并汇总相对风险估计值(SRRE)为1.08(95%CI 0.91 - 1.29;异质性(H)-P值 = 0.12)。对于第一组队列中的总研究人群,SRRE为1.14(95%CI 0.93 - 1.39;H - P值 = 0.05),对于亚队列,SRRE为1.30(95%CI 1.09 - 1.55)。在该亚队列分析中,欧洲对各行业工人的研究关联度(SRRE = 1.38;基于4项研究)高于美国对航空航天和飞机工人的研究关联度(SRRE = 0.97,基于4项研究)。
尽管在一些分析中观察到了正相关,但不同职业群体(航空航天/飞机与其他行业合并)、研究地点以及发病率与死亡率终点之间的结果并不一致。此外,各研究中未一致观察到暴露 - 反应趋势。解释还受到其他职业或生活方式暴露(如吸烟或饮酒)未控制的混杂因素潜在影响的限制。鉴于这些局限性,目前可得的流行病学数据不足以支持职业性TCE暴露与肝脏/胆道癌之间存在因果关系。