Cheng Karis K F, Leung S F, Thompson David R, Tai Josepha W M, Liang Raymond H S, Kan Alta S T, Ying Fion W O, Yeung Rebecca M W
The Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Cancer. 2007 Jun 15;109(12):2590-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22730.
Oropharyngeal mucositis (OM) causes profound impairment of patients' health-related quality of life (HQoL). The aim of the article is to describe the development and preliminary validation of an HQoL instrument, OMQoL, specifically for patients with OM.
First, a qualitative phase was conducted to generate items (n = 23). Face validity was assessed by focus group interviews (n = 13). Expert content review (n = 7) was used to ensure content validity. The second step was a quantitative validation phase comprised a multicenter study (n = 210) to help identify subscales of the instrument addressing different dimensions of OM and to measure reliability.
The qualitative interview generated 171 items. Using focus group discussion and expert content review, items were reduced to 41 items. Factor and scaling analyses of these 41 items resulted in 4 subscales, contributed by 31 items, depicting problems with symptoms, diet, social function, and swallowing. The floor effect was modest. The factorial structure was satisfactory with loading >0.40 on each subscale for all items. All corrected item-total corrections were higher than 0.40 (r = 0.457-0.874). The internal consistency reliability of each subscale was high, with Cronbach alpha coefficients ranging from 0.906 to 0.934. The test-retest reliability of the individual items using weighted kappa was good (kappa values 0.610-0.895). The intraclass correlation results for the subscale totals were all in excess of 0.70 (0.864-0.934).
An initial psychometric analysis of the OMQoL was encouraging. The OMQoL could provide a valuable tool for the assessment of HQoL of patients with OM.
口咽黏膜炎(OM)会严重损害患者的健康相关生活质量(HQoL)。本文旨在描述一种专门针对OM患者的HQoL工具——OMQoL的开发及初步验证过程。
首先进行定性阶段以生成条目(n = 23)。通过焦点小组访谈(n = 13)评估表面效度。采用专家内容评审(n = 7)确保内容效度。第二步是定量验证阶段,包括一项多中心研究(n = 210),以帮助确定该工具中涉及OM不同维度的子量表,并测量信度。
定性访谈生成了171个条目。通过焦点小组讨论和专家内容评审,条目减少至41个。对这41个条目的因子分析和量表分析产生了4个子量表,由31个条目构成,描述了症状、饮食、社会功能和吞咽方面的问题。地板效应较小。所有条目的因子结构令人满意,每个子量表上的载荷均>0.40。所有校正后的条目-总分相关系数均高于0.40(r = 0.457 - 0.874)。每个子量表的内部一致性信度较高,Cronbach α系数范围为0.906至0.934。使用加权kappa对单个条目的重测信度良好(kappa值为0.610 - 0.895)。子量表总分的组内相关结果均超过0.70(0.864 - 0.934)。
OMQoL的初步心理测量分析结果令人鼓舞。OMQoL可为评估OM患者的HQoL提供有价值的工具。