Matthaei Klaus I
Gene Targeting Laboratory, The John Curtin School of Medical Research, GPO Box 334, Canberra City, ACT 0200, Australia.
J Physiol. 2007 Jul 15;582(Pt 2):481-8. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.134908. Epub 2007 May 10.
Although genetic manipulations in mice have provided a powerful tool for investigating gene function in vivo, recent studies have uncovered a number of developmental phenomena that complicate the attribution of phenotype to the specific genetic change. A more realistic approach has been to modulate gene expression and function in a temporal and tissue-specific manner. The most common of these methods, the CreLoxP and tetracycline response systems, are surveyed here and their recently identified shortcomings discussed, along with a less well known system based on the E. coli lac operon and modified for use in mammals. The potential for further complications in interpretation due to hitherto unexpected epigenetic effects involving transfer of RNA or protein in oocytes or sperm is also explored. Given these problems we reiterate the necessity for the use of completely reversible methods that will allow each experimental group of animals to act as their own control. Using these methods with a number of specific modifications to eliminate non-specific effects from random insertion sites and inducer molecules, the full potential of genetic manipulation studies should be realized.
尽管对小鼠进行基因操作已为在体内研究基因功能提供了强大工具,但最近的研究发现了一些发育现象,这些现象使将表型归因于特定基因变化变得复杂。一种更现实的方法是以时间和组织特异性的方式调节基因表达和功能。本文综述了这些方法中最常用的CreLoxP和四环素反应系统,并讨论了它们最近发现的缺点,还介绍了一种基于大肠杆菌乳糖操纵子并经修饰用于哺乳动物的鲜为人知的系统。本文还探讨了由于涉及卵母细胞或精子中RNA或蛋白质转移的迄今未预料到的表观遗传效应而导致解释进一步复杂化的可能性。鉴于这些问题,我们重申使用完全可逆方法的必要性,这种方法将使每组实验动物都能作为自身的对照。通过对这些方法进行一些特定修改以消除随机插入位点和诱导分子的非特异性效应,应能实现基因操作研究的全部潜力。