Wotherspoon H A, Kenny G N, McArdle C S
University Department of Surgery, Royal Infirmary, Glasgow.
Anaesthesia. 1991 Nov;46(11):915-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1991.tb09845.x.
A prospective, double-blind, single-dose placebo-controlled four-part crossover study of 12 healthy volunteers was carried out to compare the analgesic efficacy of controlled-release dihydrocodeine tablets 60, 90 and 120 mg (DHC Continus tablets, Napp Laboratories) in cold-induced pain. Subjects received each of the four treatments in a random order using a latin square design. On each of the four study days, the volunteers performed cold pressor tests, before dose and again at 4, 8 and 12 hours after dose. Subjects rated their pain continuously over a 120-second period using a visual analogue scale. At 4 hours there was a significant reduction in pain in subjects who received 120 mg or 90 mg tablets compared with placebo, and in subjects who received 120 mg tablets compared with those who received 60 mg tablets. At 8 hours, 120 mg and 90 mg dihydrocodeine were still better than placebo. There was no significant difference in side effects between treatments.
开展了一项针对12名健康志愿者的前瞻性、双盲、单剂量安慰剂对照四部分交叉研究,以比较60毫克、90毫克和120毫克控释双氢可待因片(DHC Continus片,纳普实验室)对冷诱导疼痛的镇痛效果。受试者采用拉丁方设计,以随机顺序接受四种治疗中的每一种。在四个研究日中的每一天,志愿者在给药前以及给药后4小时、8小时和12小时进行冷加压试验。受试者使用视觉模拟量表在120秒内持续对疼痛进行评分。在4小时时,与安慰剂相比,接受120毫克或90毫克片剂的受试者疼痛显著减轻,与接受60毫克片剂的受试者相比,接受120毫克片剂的受试者疼痛也显著减轻。在8小时时,120毫克和90毫克双氢可待因仍比安慰剂效果好。各治疗组之间的副作用无显著差异。