Rahman Mahbubur, Kieke Burney A, Vandermause Mary F, Mitchell Paul D, Greenlee Robert T, Belongia Edward A
Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation, Marshfield, WI 54449, USA.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007 Aug;58(4):413-8. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2007.03.011. Epub 2007 May 16.
Early diagnosis of influenza infection is needed to optimize the benefit of prescribing antiviral drugs. However, the accuracy of rapid tests is highly variable. This study evaluated the performance of Directigen flu A+B enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and direct fluorescent assay (DFA) during the 2004-2005 influenza season. Participants with medically attended acute respiratory illness were identified through an active surveillance. Consenting patients (n=818) were enrolled and cultured for influenza. Physicians ordered a rapid antigen test (EIA or DFA) according to their clinical judgment. Physicians ordered rapid tests with EIA (n=109), DFA (n=86), or both (n=9) in 204 patients with acute respiratory illness who were also cultured for influenza. The EIA detected 18 of 43 influenza infections (sensitivity, 42%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 28-57%), whereas DFA detected 26 of 38 influenza infections (sensitivity, 68%; 95% CI, 53-81%). Compared with culture, specificity of both EIA and DFA was 96%. During the 2004-2005 influenza season, both the EIA and DFA had low sensitivity and failed to detect influenza in many patients.
为了优化抗病毒药物处方的益处,需要对流感感染进行早期诊断。然而,快速检测的准确性差异很大。本研究评估了2004 - 2005年流感季节Directigen甲型/乙型流感酶免疫测定法(EIA)和直接荧光测定法(DFA)的性能。通过主动监测确定有医疗就诊的急性呼吸道疾病患者。同意参与的患者(n = 818)被纳入并进行流感培养。医生根据临床判断开出快速抗原检测(EIA或DFA)。在204例同时进行流感培养的急性呼吸道疾病患者中,医生开出了EIA快速检测(n = 109)、DFA快速检测(n = 86)或两者同时检测(n = 9)。EIA在43例流感感染中检测出18例(敏感性为42%;95%置信区间[CI],28 - 57%),而DFA在38例流感感染中检测出26例(敏感性为68%;95%CI,53 - 81%)。与培养结果相比,EIA和DFA的特异性均为96%。在2004 - 2005年流感季节,EIA和DFA的敏感性均较低,未能在许多患者中检测出流感。