Vovk A, Binks A P
Department of Physiological Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2007 Sep;103(3):779-86. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01185.2006. Epub 2007 May 17.
Air hunger is an unpleasant urge to breathe and a distressing respiratory symptom of cardiopulmonary patients. An increase in tidal volume relieves air hunger, possibly by increasing pulmonary stretch receptor cycle amplitude. The purpose of this study was to determine whether increasing end-expiratory volume (EEV) also relieves air hunger. Six healthy volunteers (3 women, 31 +/- 4 yr old) were mechanically ventilated via a mouthpiece (12 breaths/min, constant end-tidal Pco(2)) at high minute ventilation (Ve; 12 +/- 2 l/min, control) and low Ve (6 +/- 1 l/min, air hunger). EEV was raised to approximately 150, 400, 725, and 1,000 ml by increasing positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) to 2, 4, 6, and 8 cmH(2)O, respectively, for 1 min during high and low Ve. The protocol was repeated with the subjects in the seated and supine positions to test for the effect of shifting baseline EEV. Air hunger intensity was rated at the end of each breath on a visual analog scale. The increase in EEV was the same in the seated and supine positions; however, air hunger was reduced to a greater extent in the seated position (13, 30, 31, and 44% seated vs. 3, 9, 23, and 27% supine at 2, 4, 6, and 8 cmH(2)O PEEP, respectively, P < 0.05). Removing PEEP produced a slight increase in air hunger that was greater than pre-PEEP levels (P < 0.05). Air hunger is relieved by increases in EEV and tidal volume (presumably via an increase in mean pulmonary stretch receptor activity and cycle amplitude, respectively).
气促是一种令人不适的呼吸冲动,是心肺疾病患者令人痛苦的呼吸症状。潮气量增加可缓解气促,可能是通过增加肺牵张感受器循环幅度实现的。本研究的目的是确定增加呼气末容积(EEV)是否也能缓解气促。六名健康志愿者(3名女性,31±4岁)通过咬嘴进行机械通气(12次/分钟,呼气末二氧化碳分压恒定),在高分钟通气量(Ve;12±2升/分钟,对照)和低Ve(6±1升/分钟,气促)状态下进行。通过分别将呼气末正压(PEEP)增加到2、4、6和8厘米水柱,使EEV在高Ve和低Ve期间分别升高到约150、400、725和1000毫升,持续1分钟。受试者分别处于坐位和仰卧位重复该方案,以测试基线EEV变化的影响。在每次呼吸结束时,用气促视觉模拟评分法对气促强度进行评分。坐位和仰卧位时EEV的增加相同;然而,坐位时气促缓解程度更大(在2、4、6和8厘米水柱PEEP时,坐位分别为13%、30%、31%和44%,仰卧位分别为3%、9%、23%和27%,P < 0.05)。去除PEEP会使气促略有增加,且大于PEEP前水平(P < 0.05)。气促可通过增加EEV和潮气量得到缓解(可能分别是通过增加平均肺牵张感受器活动和循环幅度)。