• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对万维网上患者炎症性肠病信息资源的系统评价。

A systematic review of patient inflammatory bowel disease information resources on the World Wide Web.

作者信息

Bernard André, Langille Morgan, Hughes Stephanie, Rose Caren, Leddin Desmond, Veldhuyzen van Zanten Sander

机构信息

Division of Anesthesiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Sep;102(9):2070-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01325.x. Epub 2007 May 19.

DOI:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01325.x
PMID:17511753
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The Internet is a widely used information resource for patients with inflammatory bowel disease, but there is variation in the quality of Web sites that have patient information regarding Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. The purpose of the current study is to systematically evaluate the quality of these Web sites.

METHODS

The top 50 Web sites appearing in Google using the terms "Crohn's disease" or "ulcerative colitis" were included in the study. Web sites were evaluated using a (a) Quality Evaluation Instrument (QEI) that awarded Web sites points (0-107) for specific information on various aspects of inflammatory bowel disease, (b) a five-point Global Quality Score (GQS), (c) two reading grade level scores, and (d) a six-point integrity score.

RESULTS

Thirty-four Web sites met the inclusion criteria, 16 Web sites were excluded because they were portals or non-IBD oriented. The median QEI score was 57 with five Web sites scoring higher than 75 points. The median Global Quality Score was 2.0 with five Web sites achieving scores of 4 or 5. The average reading grade level score was 11.2. The median integrity score was 3.0.

CONCLUSIONS

There is marked variation in the quality of the Web sites containing information on Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Many Web sites suffered from poor quality but there were five high-scoring Web sites.

摘要

背景与目的

互联网是炎症性肠病患者广泛使用的信息资源,但关于克罗恩病和溃疡性结肠炎的患者信息网站质量存在差异。本研究的目的是系统评估这些网站的质量。

方法

本研究纳入了在谷歌上使用“克罗恩病”或“溃疡性结肠炎”搜索词出现的前50个网站。使用以下方法对网站进行评估:(a)质量评估工具(QEI),该工具根据炎症性肠病各方面的特定信息为网站打分(0-107分);(b)五分制全球质量评分(GQS);(c)两个阅读年级水平评分;(d)六分制完整性评分。

结果

34个网站符合纳入标准,16个网站因是门户网站或非炎症性肠病导向而被排除。QEI评分中位数为57分,有5个网站得分高于75分。全球质量评分中位数为2.0,有5个网站得分为4或5分。平均阅读年级水平评分为11.2。完整性评分中位数为3.0。

结论

包含克罗恩病和溃疡性结肠炎信息的网站质量存在显著差异。许多网站质量较差,但有5个高分网站。

相似文献

1
A systematic review of patient inflammatory bowel disease information resources on the World Wide Web.对万维网上患者炎症性肠病信息资源的系统评价。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Sep;102(9):2070-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01325.x. Epub 2007 May 19.
2
Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in Crohn's disease and inflammatory bowel disease.干预措施用于克罗恩病和炎症性肠病的腹痛管理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 29;11(11):CD013531. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013531.pub2.
3
Strategies for detecting colon cancer and/or dysplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.检测炎症性肠病患者结肠癌和/或发育异常的策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19(2):CD000279. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000279.pub3.
4
Strategies for detecting colon cancer and/or dysplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.检测炎症性肠病患者结肠癌和/或发育异常的策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(2):CD000279. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000279.pub2.
5
Endoscopic scoring indices for evaluation of disease activity in ulcerative colitis.用于评估溃疡性结肠炎疾病活动度的内镜评分指数。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):CD011450. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011450.pub2.
6
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
7
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
8
Mu-opioid antagonists for opioid-induced bowel dysfunction in people with cancer and people receiving palliative care.用于癌症患者和接受姑息治疗患者的阿片类药物引起的肠道功能障碍的μ-阿片受体拮抗剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 5;6(6):CD006332. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006332.pub3.
9
Stem cell transplantation for induction of remission in medically refractory Crohn's disease.干细胞移植治疗药物难治性克罗恩病诱导缓解。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 13;5(5):CD013070. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013070.pub2.
10
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality and reliability of prostate cancer-Videos on TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-sectional content analysis study.TikTok和哔哩哔哩上前列腺癌相关视频的质量与可靠性:横断面内容分析研究
Digit Health. 2025 Sep 3;11:20552076251376263. doi: 10.1177/20552076251376263. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Is YouTube a reliable source for learning pre-endodontic build-up? A cross-sectional study.YouTube是学习根管治疗术前牙体预备的可靠来源吗?一项横断面研究。
Restor Dent Endod. 2025 Aug;50(3):e27. doi: 10.5395/rde.2025.50.e27. Epub 2025 Jul 24.
3
Comparison of YouTube, TikTok, and Instagram as digital sources for obtaining information about pulp therapy in primary and permanent teeth.
比较YouTube、TikTok和Instagram作为获取有关乳牙和恒牙牙髓治疗信息的数字来源。
Restor Dent Endod. 2025 Aug;50(3):e26. doi: 10.5395/rde.2025.50.e26. Epub 2025 Jul 24.
4
Analysing YouTube as a health resource: quality and reliability of videos on pediatric appendicitis.将YouTube作为一种健康资源进行分析:关于小儿阑尾炎视频的质量与可靠性
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Aug 30;25(1):1229. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07869-2.
5
Single-Position Lumbar Fusion Online Videos for Patient Education: Understandability, Reliability, and Quality.用于患者教育的单节段腰椎融合在线视频:可理解性、可靠性和质量
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2025 Aug 19;9(8). doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00275. eCollection 2025 Aug 1.
6
Evaluating the reliability and quality of knee osteoarthritis educational content on TikTok and Bilibili: A cross-sectional content analysis.评估抖音和哔哩哔哩上膝骨关节炎教育内容的可靠性和质量:一项横断面内容分析。
Digit Health. 2025 Aug 12;11:20552076251366390. doi: 10.1177/20552076251366390. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
7
Quality and reliability of YouTube videos on fascial sling surgery.YouTube上关于筋膜悬吊手术视频的质量与可靠性
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2025 Aug 8;71(7):e20250140. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20250140. eCollection 2025.
8
Evaluation of the quality and reliability of Chinese content about orthognathic surgery on BiliBili and TikTok: a cross-sectional study.哔哩哔哩和抖音上正颌外科中文内容的质量与可靠性评估:一项横断面研究
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 7;15(1):28967. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-13941-0.
9
Effects of YouTube Health Videos on Mental Health Literacy in Adolescents and Teachers: Randomized Controlled Trial.YouTube健康视频对青少年和教师心理健康素养的影响:随机对照试验
JMIR Ment Health. 2025 Jul 31;12:e76004. doi: 10.2196/76004.
10
Most TikTok Videos Regarding the Anterolateral Ligament of the Knee Are Posted by Patients and Have Little Educational Value.大多数关于膝关节前外侧韧带的TikTok视频是由患者发布的,且几乎没有教育价值。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2025 Jan 29;7(3):101101. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101101. eCollection 2025 Jun.